Search for: "GENERAL MOTORS CORP" Results 581 - 600 of 1,435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2016, 6:31 am by Robert C. Weill
General Motors Corp., 522 U.S. 222 (1998), where the Supreme Court expressly made “clear that public policy of one state [had] no effect on whether the state must give full faith and credit to judgments. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 10:18 am by Larry
Similarly, rear windows are not generally considered an a [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 5:55 am by Larry
" The rate generally applicable to motor vehicles for the transport of people (i.e., cars, passenger vans, and SUVs) is 2.5%. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: Lord Lucas proposes new UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 section to provide remedy for groundless copyright threats (1709 Copyright Blog) (Techdirt) US CAFC scraps point of novelty for design patents: International Seaway Trading Corp. v Walgreens (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Inventive Step)   Global… [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am by Kelly
Global Global – General Corporate business leaders: Want to create value from your IP? [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(EFF)   United States US General US Chamber of Commerce cites #19 rank, wants tougher IP laws (Ars Technica) USPTO Director David Kappos blogs (Securing Innovation) Kappos sets goals for new PTO administration (Inventive Step) (Patents4Life)   US Patent Reform Tech companies send letter on patent reform to Secretary Locke (Patent Docs)   US Patents Summary of local patent rules affecting claim construction practice (Part 3 of 5) (Gray on Claims) Did you know...… [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
General Motors Corp., 141 F.3d 714, 720 (7th Cir. 1998) (disallowing opinion of expert witness, who “lacked any scientific basis for an opinion about … motives,” about defendant’s failure to add safety measure in order to “save money”); In re Diet Drugs Prods. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:42 pm by Julie Lam
General Motors Corp, No. 143455, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed in part the decision of the WCAC and remanded the case to the Board of Magistrates for the reasons set forth in the WCAC dissenting opinion. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:47 am by Robert Kreisman
  On June 21, 2012, Taylor filed a lawsuit against Lemans Corp., Moose Racing, Parts Unlimited and Gibbs Motor Corp., alleging strict liability for a defective product, negligence and breach of implied warranties. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) China’s biggest ever patent dispute comes to a multi-million dollar end: Chint v… [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm by Kelly
Haldex Brake Products Corp (Patents Post Grant Blog) District court N D Illinois: Pequignot does not address pleading requirements for false marking intent to deceive: Patent Compliance Group Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
: IPO announces public consultation on trade mark fees (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (Out-Law) (IPKat) US Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Patent Reform Act 2009 (Inventive Step) (Patent Prospector) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Law360) (Hal Wegner)   Global Global - General The global economic crisis and the intellectual property ecosystem IP Think Tank podcast 6 March 2009 (IP Think Tank)… [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:13 pm by Greg Mersol
General Motors Corp., 133 F.3d 388 (6th Cir. 1998) (en banc), the Sixth Circuit similarly rejected class-wide claims for retiree medical benefits by a class of salaried employees, even though it has freely found for unionized employees asserting similar claims involving a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e, the notice of claim should have been served within 90 days, or by February 5, 2013. [read post]