Search for: "HARTNESS v. STATE"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,039
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
An opportunity for defendants to shift the balance of power and wrest complete control over the company can constitute irreparable injury (see Vanderminden v Vanderminden, 226 AD2d 1037, 1041 [1996]; Casita, LP v Maplewood Equity Partners [Offshore] Ltd., 17 Misc 3d 1137A, *8 [2007]; see also Matter of Brenner v Hart Sys., 114 AD2d 363, 366 [1985]). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:11 am
Oxford ; Portland, Ore. : Hart, 2011 KF 272 M67 2011 Getting a PhD in law / Caroline Morris and Cian Murphy. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 6:00 am
Hart, The Concept of Law 9 [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Hart, The Concept of Law 9 [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:33 pm
Wade by John Hart Ely (1973) - 1,07942 Stan. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:02 am
It is interesting that at the ECHR the state appeared to represent that defeat as evidence of an anti-abortion majority in the state, particularly when only some 42% of the population turned out to vote. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:38 pm
A renewed Nokia v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 6:37 am
The Nobel Memorial Prize in EconomicsEconomists Oliver Hart and Bengt Holmström were awarded the Nobel prize in economics for their work on contracts. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 pm
He was co-counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 May 2009, 5:53 pm
v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
State of California, Dept. of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:24 pm
” David Spade v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 2:00 am
Unrein v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm
Also differences based on housing status has been held to be within Art 14 (Larkos v Cyprus 30 EHRR 597, R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] 1 AC 311).If the arguments were right, it would affect many provisions of the Housing Acts and Rent Acts. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 9:29 am
Fleck, Holland& Hart LLP, Jackson, Wyoming; Steve Andersen, Holland & Hart LLP,Boise, Idaho; Christina F. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:14 am
Hart, H. [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:54 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
EEOC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:16 am
’ Since the Town Board left itself this latitude to identify additional areas in the future, the petitioner did not ‘establish a clear conflict with the comprehensive plan’ (Matter of Hart v Town Bd. of Town of Huntington, 114 AD3d at 683, quoting Infinity Consulting Group, Inc. v Town of Huntington, 49 AD3d at 814). [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:16 am
’ Since the Town Board left itself this latitude to identify additional areas in the future, the petitioner did not ‘establish a clear conflict with the comprehensive plan’ (Matter of Hart v Town Bd. of Town of Huntington, 114 AD3d at 683, quoting Infinity Consulting Group, Inc. v Town of Huntington, 49 AD3d at 814). [read post]
