Search for: "Hard Times Express, Inc." Results 581 - 600 of 1,160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am by Ben
Leo Feist, Inc. 234 F. 105 (S.D.N.Y. 1916) where Judge Learned Hand had to compare two works to determine if there had been copying. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm by Schachtman
Salim Shah and his companies Sarfez Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sarfez USA, Inc. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:25 pm
Just reading it, it’s somewhat hard to tell what the drafters were thinking. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 6:11 am
ILFC did not seek appellate review of the order at that time. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 11:00 am by Guest Author
 In Purple Communications, Inc. (2014), the NLRB ruled that employers must presumptively allow employees to use their work issued email accounts for statutorily protected communications during nonworking time. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
At the time, “Canadian citizenship was virtually a universal requirement for admittance to any of the provincial law societies” and law societies were strong advocates of the limiting entry to the profession to Canadian citizens. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 4:52 am by Robin Shea
If the exception is found to apply, then the Diocese will win in the end.* But that may be a hard sell because Ms. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm by Chuck Cosson
”[7] So, foundationally, privacy law is an expression of state power aimed at protecting personal health and well-being. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
 Although it could not be an exaggeration to suggest that one may surely link but do so at his/her own peril, it is hard to think of a case that had a higher potential to affect our daily activities over the internet than Svensson. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 1:28 pm by Ron Coleman
NFL Films, Inc., 542 F.3d 1007, 1014–15 (3d Cir. 2008). [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:37 am by Steven Koprince
., an 8(a) program participant, and its large business mentor, The Pike Company, Inc. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:00 pm by Jason M. Halper
While acknowledging the “unfortunate” timing of the exclusivity agreement, given that two days into the period another bidder emerged and expressed interest in an acquisition at $4.00-6.00 per share, the Court stated that “Revlon requires reasonable decisions, not perfect ones. [read post]