Search for: "Hart v. Hart" Results 581 - 600 of 1,662
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2016, 4:15 am by Walter Olson
Cato files amicus in “hydroponic gear + discarded tea leaves = raid their house” case [Ilya Shapiro and Randal John Meyer, earlier on Harte v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 3:45 am by Eric Turkewitz
Don’t lawyers on the same side of the “v” protect each other like cops and doctors do? [read post]
There are significant additions to the Senate bill that are not presently contained in the House bill, including a whistleblower immunity provision, a shorter statute of limitation (3 years v. 5 years), lower exemplary damages (2 times v. 3 times actual damages), as well as increased criminal penalties for a violation of the Economic Espionage Act and it also includes portions of the DTSA as predicate offenses for the RICO Act. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 9:23 am
IP and Other Things:  A Collection of Essays and Speeches by Robin Jacob is published by Hart Publishing (Bloomsbury). [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 HLA Hart’s discussion of the internal viewpoint on an institution; less worry about litigation and more about what one ought to do. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:03 pm by Andrew Hamm
Senator Philip Hart (D-Michigan) remarked that people might have the “accurate impression that U.S. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:27 pm
 * Book Review: Patent Enforcement Worldwide "In Honour of Dieter Stauder," Patent Enforcement Worldwide is the third edition of Hart Publishing's country reports on patent enforcement practices and litigation strategies. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
In Broida, the court concluded that jurisdiction could be exercised over an action involving the internal affairs of a foreign corporation doing business in New York, unless New York was an inappropriate or inconvenient forum (id. at 91-92; see Hart v General Motors Corp., 129 AD2d 179, 185-186 [1st Dept 1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 608 [1987]). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
In Broida, the court concluded that jurisdiction could be exercised over an action involving the internal affairs of a foreign corporation doing business in New York, unless New York was an inappropriate or inconvenient forum (id. at 91-92; see Hart v General Motors Corp., 129 AD2d 179, 185-186 [1st Dept 1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 608 [1987]). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
In Broida, the court concluded that jurisdiction could be exercised over an action involving the internal affairs of a foreign corporation doing business in New York, unless New York was an inappropriate or inconvenient forum (id. at 91-92; see Hart v General Motors Corp., 129 AD2d 179, 185-186 [1st Dept 1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 608 [1987]). [read post]