Search for: "I. S. T. v. R. W. B." Results 581 - 600 of 1,179
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2015, 9:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Rules v. standards: vague(r) claim language helps or could help block mere design-arounds. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 8:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Early bargaining: avoids holdup costs, especially w/r/t/ standard-setting organizations. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
[w]ere ambiguous, and the Court d[id] not find that they [we]re”); James T. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
As I discussed here, the Fourth Circuit recently ruled in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 2:36 pm by familoo
See A and B v Rotherham MBC [2014] EWFC 47 Fam. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  If we don’t restrict reimportation, we should accept a single price and a loss of ability to fund R&D. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
What does “pretend” mean, especially as it is absent from subsection (b)? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
Rule 26(a)(2)(B) now requires service of expert witness reports that contain, among other things: (i) a complete statement of all opinions the witness will express and the basis and reasons for them; (ii) the facts or data considered by the witness in forming them; (iii) any exhibits that will be used to summarize or support them. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Distinction between consumer and citizen: Discomfort w/how Qs of inherent distinctiveness are assessed b/c starting point is that we are looking at signs that might qualify as TMs. [read post]
28 May 2015, 1:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A: Bill Graham, Warren v. [read post]