Search for: "IN RE: ADOPTION OF B. C. F."
Results 581 - 600
of 1,049
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2015, 11:31 am
Togus Reg’l Office, Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 294 F. [read post]
7 May 2015, 10:35 am
As drafted and passed by Congress, Section 215 is just a grand jury subpoena authority: In adopting § 215, Congress intended to give the government, on the approval of the FISC, broad‐ ranging investigative powers analogous to those traditionally used in connection with grand jury investigations into possible criminal behavior. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
” In re Shurley, 115 F.3d 333 (5th Cir. 1997), citing G. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
” In re Shurley, 115 F.3d 333 (5th Cir. 1997), citing G. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Does it have res judicata effect? [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Does it have res judicata effect? [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:56 am
Code § 1030(a)(5)(A), (c)(4)(B) and one count of possessing unauthorized access devices in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 503 F. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 6:36 pm
You’re probably most familiar with Social Security Numbers. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:32 am
If I were dictator for a day, adopting a single standardized test for employee vs. independent contractor would be high on my to-do list. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:05 am
§ 1030(a)(2)(C). [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
Boxes e and f. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:48 am
” Testimony of Anick Bérard, Kuykendall v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
P., 117 F. 3d 579. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
P., 117 F. 3d 579. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:06 pm
For the purpose of subsection (f)(2), the following rules apply: (1) If the birth mother is married and no divorce proceeding is pending, in the absence of clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, her spouse satisfies subsection (f)(2)(A) or (B). (2) If the birth mother is a surviving spouse and at her deceased spouse’s death no divorce proceeding was pending, in the absence of clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, her deceased spouse satisfies… [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
ARBITRABILITY OF HEALTH CARE LIABILITY CLAIMS IN TEXAS: FAA PREEMPTION AND MFA REVERSE PREEMPTION IN THE MED-MAL CONTEXT In an opinion released today, the Texas Supreme Court holds that the federal law that accords states the right to regulate the business of insurance (McCarran-Ferguson Act) does not furnish an exception to the general principle that the FAA (Federal Arbitration Act) preempts the TAA (Texas Arbitration Act) and other state arbitration laws when the two conflict, where the… [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:47 pm
This morning the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its decision in Case C-463/12 Copydan Båndkopi, a reference for a preliminary ruling from Denmark, seeking clarification on key questions relating to the so-called ‘private copying’ exception under Article 5(2)(b) of the Information Society Directive 2001/29. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:18 am
Independent Expert, which I have re-posted here. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
One of our readers sent us that brief (a publicly filed document) and asked us to comment.So we will, but we’re not identifying either the case or the plaintiff’s lawyer – if you’re reading, you know who you are.To us, the plaintiff’s proposition is, in one word, absurd. [read post]
