Search for: "Impact Productions, Inc. v. Impact Productions, LLC" Results 581 - 600 of 796
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
Consumers might also be misled into believing that the handbag is an authentic product endorsed by the original luxury brands, which could result in claims of false endorsement or false advertising. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 2:07 pm by Daphne Keller
The European Commission recently released a Communication on Tackling Illegal Content Online. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
    In re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, No. 11-2664, decided June 28, 2012, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court decision (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)[2], which dismissed the claim of Humana Insurance Company (“Humana”) and other similarly situated providers of MAOs against GlaxoSmithKline, LLC and GlaxoSmithKline plc (collectively, “GSK”) for reimbursement of medical expenses… [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
    In re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, No. 11-2664, decided June 28, 2012, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court decision (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)[2], which dismissed the claim of Humana Insurance Company (“Humana”) and other similarly situated providers of MAOs against GlaxoSmithKline, LLC and GlaxoSmithKline plc (collectively, “GSK”) for reimbursement of medical expenses… [read post]
28 Feb 2006, 11:42 pm
" (TTABlog discussion here).Blue Man Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm by Marty Lederman
  The oral argument thus renewed the mystery of why the Court granted certiorari in the first place--especially after it had denied the petition in Elane Photography, LLC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:56 am by Dennis Crouch
The IP Innovations Case As many of our readers pointed out, Federal Circuit Judge Rader, who sat by designation in the Cornell case, also recently sat by designation in IP Innovation, LLC v. [read post]