Search for: "In Re CAL" Results 581 - 600 of 5,796
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2016, 1:16 pm
It's bad enough when you're violating a protective order by following your ex-wife's bus in your car.It's even worse when you're driving on a suspended license.Drunk. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 12:03 pm
Just because you're evading the police on your own piece of land -- driving like a bat out of hell thereupon -- doesn't mean you're not guilty of evading the police.So holds the Court of Appeal. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 1:02 pm
If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck.Even if the parties may think (or may even say) they're not in a dating relationship, if that's what they're in fact in, the trial court may permissibly so find. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
(See Canizales, supra, 7 Cal.5th at pp. 609–611.) [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 11:56 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Union Oil Co. of Cal., 814 F.2d 628, 631 (Fed. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 11:01 pm
” (See also In re Marriage of Lietz (2024) 99 Cal.App.5th 664, 673 [applying the Sanchez findings re state evidentiary rules to civil actions].) [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
The background is a case captioned In re Joseph H., S227929, from the 2d District, in which the Supreme Court denied review in a 4 to 3 vote, with Justices Liu, Cuellar, and Kruger voting for review. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 2:52 pm
  But, in truth, they're talking about two entirely different concepts. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 1:28 pm
(Of course, if you're a true devotee, you already knew all about this rule....)Rule 8.74. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 3:27 pm
An eagle-eyed reader directs our attention to footnote 10 on page 11 of In re Butler, issued yesterday by a unanimous Cal Supreme Court. [read post]