Search for: "In Re Opinion of the Justices." Results 581 - 600 of 14,122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2007, 1:24 pm
It even contains jokes (though they're funny only in context). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:28 am by Ronald Mann
Early in Lisa Blatt’s argument for Starbucks, Justice Sonia Sotomayor commented, “I do understand why that needs to be corrected because you’re right, it’s the court that has to decide the likelihood of [success] on the merits. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
He agreed, but then re-emphasized the problems this was causing him. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Supreme Court—Chief Justice Earl Warren and Justice William Brennan—were Republicans appointed by President Dwight D. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:03 am by Amy Howe
Bruen, striking down New York’s handgun-licensing scheme, the court of appeals issued a new opinion that threw out Rahimi’s conviction. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 6:14 pm
First, Justice Huffman (and the rest of the panel) knows this, and in a fairly brief opinion, says so. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 3:04 pm
  Justice Kennedy filed a separate concurrence breaking from that portion of the majority's opinion; in his view, the court of appeals should be required, not merely permitted, to undertake that re-examination. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 6:22 am by Ronald Mann
Perhaps this case interests the justices because it turns less on the language of the Copyright Act than it does on the meaning of a trilogy of 19th-century Supreme Court cases, which established that the opinions that courts issue cannot be copyrighted: Anyone can copy those opinions, even if the copier finds the opinions in a published volume. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:41 pm by Ronald Mann
So one possibility is that there will be a scattering of opinions with three or more different views. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 1:37 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
But as the January 4 filing deadline approaches, what criminal-justice related races out there merit watching? [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 3:54 am by Gregory Forman
Had I been a member of the South Carolina Supreme Court in June 2008, I would have voted for In Re Wood, 378 S.C. 632, 663 S.E.2d 496 (2008) to be In Re an Anonymous Member of the Bar. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 3:56 pm by ilpc
This is the appeal of the court of appeals opinion posted here. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:14 am by Chris Seaton
Which of the five justices drew the short straw and had to write the opinion? [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:27 am
 And see this published opinion here for a case on the right to appellate counsel for misdemeanors.Today's DJ profiles former Justice Bruiniers in Patience and Gravitas -- Terence Bruiniers of JAMS is skilled at getting parties to control their emotions, lawyers say. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:13 pm by Steve Vladeck
[Those interested in a more sustained discourse on this body of law should check out Part I of Justice Brennan's opinion for the Court in Sanders v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:02 am by Dan Bressler
” “As we reported earlier this month, that complaint concerns in part HSF’s work on the Griggs review, which dealt with compensating victims of the fraud but was ultimately deemed flawed and is now being re-run. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:21 am by Amanda Rice
The Justices are expected to issue opinions this morning at 10 a.m.; later today, they will meet for their private Conference (here are the petitions up for consideration that we’re watching). [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 12:32 pm
  What justice has enough time to write 60-page opinions, even in unusual cases? [read post]