Search for: "In re: PROCEEDINGS REGARDING CONDUCT OF COUNSEL" Results 581 - 600 of 1,458
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2018, 8:10 am by Scott R. Anderson
Vance Spath, abated proceedings indefinitely, proclaiming, “We’re done until a superior court tells me to keep going. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am by John Elwood
Obviously, they’re taking a close look at this case. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by Elizabeth Marshall Anderson
While the SEC recognized that decisions in other circuits may be read to require the SEC to prove conduct beyond misstatements, the SEC said counsel should consider whether this actually allows their clients to avoid the broad spectrum of conduct that falls under the antifraud provisions. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:04 am by Juan C. Antúnez
If a judge has previously approved every transaction you’re currently being sued over, surely a jury of your peers isn’t going to slam you for that same conduct, right? [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 7:52 am by Peter Breslauer
In re Hyundai and Kia Fuel Economy Litig., No. 15-56014, 2018 WL 505343 (9th Cir. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Liisa Speaker
Kosinski contended that this statement was false because thetranscript of the child protective proceeding shows that Clark pled no contest to failure to protectthe child based on his own conduct. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:23 pm by Harry Graver
As such, petitioners seek respective re-hearings before new CCA panels because their previous panels were composed in violation of law. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:14 am by MBettman
In 2008 Mason was granted federal habeas corpus relief for ineffective assistance of counsel during the penalty phase of his trial. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
CEQA Litigation/Procedural Issues Various of California’s District Courts of Appeal rendered notable decisions on a number of issues relating to the procedures and rules governing the conduct of CEQA litigation, including the following holdings: Res judicata will not apply to bar a subsequent action on the same claim between the same parties unless the first judgment was on the merits. [read post]
Regarding the City’s use of the CEQA exemptions, the court reasoned that petitioner’s argument that conditions of approval to address pedestrian safety and traffic disruption during construction were not “mitigation”; rather, they were added under the City’s CUP authority to require precautionary safety measures separate from the determination that the impacts would be less than significant and that petitioner presented no evidence to the City that project… [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
  The Commission assigned the initial stages of the proceeding to ALJ Cameron Elliot. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
  The Commission assigned the initial stages of the proceeding to ALJ Cameron Elliot. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Members of the Bar of this Court, particularly in the context of emergency proceedings, often rely on—and should be safe in relying on—the duty of counsel to update statements that have become materially false, let alone as a result of counsel’s own conduct. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 8:04 am by FHH Law
Chairman Pai echoed Carr’s sentiments regarding wise and prudent spending, expressing his hope that this proceeding will identify why the program is oversubscribed and offer ideas as to how to tackle the “substantial waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am by Lorelie S. Masters and Paul T. Moura
  Little binding precedent has developed—or will develop—regarding interpretation of the Bermuda Form given that awards are issued in confidential arbitration proceedings. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am by Lorelie S. Masters
  Little binding precedent has developed—or will develop—regarding interpretation of the Bermuda Form given that awards are issued in confidential arbitration proceedings. [read post]