Search for: "J. J. and W. J. v. J. B. and J. B." Results 581 - 600 of 1,744
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2011, 9:55 pm
 t.co/PUOUuPR 7th: Ok to substitute a party into litigation that has succeeded to the interest of the original party, even on appeal. t.co/PUOUuPR 7th: Order not literally final is appealable if only "ministerial" ruling by the lower court is reqd to make it final. t.co/PUOUuPR 7th: Universal rule-Trademark licenses aren't assignable in or out of BK absent expressly authorization in agreement. t.co/PUOUuPR 7th: Service agreement isn't a true trademark… [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 7 November, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Newbigin v S J & J Monk, requiring the consideration of the issue of what physical state a commercial property is deemed to be in for the purpose of liability for rates when it has been stripped out for renovation. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
Total fines and jail sentences have increased notably.58 A comparison of the Antitrust Division, reproduced below, and European Commission statistics, reproduced in Appendices A and B, allow for side-by-side comparison of results over time and evaluation of the relative costs and benefits of an all-civil compared to criminal prosecution regime of antitrust enforceme [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Warby J will heard the final day of the libel trial of Doyle v Smith. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  SeeRestatement (Second) of Torts §134 & comment b (1970).Restatement of TortsThe heeding presumption is derived from language in Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A, comment j (1965) that dealt with the opposite situation − presuming that an adequate warning, when given, will be read and heeded. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  The importance of the “open justice principle” in criminal cases is such that orders of this kind are very rare indeed, the only reported case in which such an order was made being A Local Authority v W ([2005] EWHC 1564 (Fam)). [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 11:41 pm
But as the W$J points out:At a minimum, however, it seems implausible that Mr. [read post]