Search for: "JOHN DOES I-X"
Results 581 - 600
of 877
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2012, 7:21 am
In other words… it’s an oil spill… perhaps the worst oil spill of which the world has ever conceived… the Exxon Valdez meets Deepwater Horizon x 100, if you will… but it’s still just an oil spill. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:39 pm
“It does take longer here,” said P.M. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 9:43 am
What does that mean? [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 8:42 pm
On one view, of course it does not. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 12:32 pm
I have no doubt Glass was happy he wasn’t a lawyer regularly appearing before her. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 9:50 pm
– TSA Administrator John S. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:45 am
In other words, does proof of dilution by blurring still hinge on proving that the marks are substantially similar or nearly identical? [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 7:38 pm
If we act on the basis of a hypothetical imperative (if I want X, then I should do Y), we act on the basis of desire and inclination--"heteronomously" in Kant's terminology. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 5:43 am
As Wikipedia notes, collateral estoppel raises concerns about due process of law, because it wouldn’t be fair for me to sue John Doe, get a judgment and then use the principle of collateral estoppel to try to ALSO enforce that judgment against Fred Roe, who wasn’t involved in the Brenner-Doe lawsuit. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:05 am
"I understand you're trying to make an argument that he won't be reformed in jail and maybe you have alternatives X, Y, & Z in mind that you're going to try to sell me on next, but you've already set my state of mind and there's a high probability that you've scuttled the rest of your argument.BUT, but, you say, I've heard well respected, long-time practitioner John Smith Esq. say the same things to you, Mr. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:58 am
" They are not finding that x caused y; at best they are finding that x perhaps caused y, or that it is not completely impossible that x caused y, or something along those lines. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
I mean really, how often does prior art have sex appeal? [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 8:13 pm
What does it mean to maximize utility? [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 5:57 am
She put the x in excess. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:41 pm
Updated x 2 | Today, guardian.co.uk’s Comment is Free (CIF) was “taken over” by the Occupy London movement. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:36 pm
John's in Exile. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 11:17 am
By John H.W. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 7:35 am
-John P.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:33 am
[x]11. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:31 pm
Given that an agent has end X, it is rational for the agent to engage in action Y, only if Y will lead to X. [read post]