Search for: "John Does 1-80" Results 581 - 600 of 843
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2011, 1:20 pm by James Hamilton
An extraordinary number of individual US Senators have written to the SEC, some during the June 10-Aug. 1 extended comment period, out of a concern that the proposed risk retention regulations are too stringent and do not conform to the legislative intent of Section 941 of the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:20 pm by James Hamilton
An extraordinary number of individual US Senators have written to the SEC, some during the June 10-Aug. 1 extended comment period, out of a concern that the proposed risk retention regulations are too stringent and do not conform to the legislative intent of Section 941 of the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:25 am by Dennis Crouch
John Deere, 383 U.S. 1 (1966) (Methodology for determining obviousness); In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413 (C.C.P.A. 1981) (A rejection premised upon a combination of references cannot be overcome by attacking the references individually); In re Morris, 127 F.3d 1048 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
However, it does show a certain level of open-mindedness and willingness to think outside of the box. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:45 pm by Bridget Crawford
No one even knows what proportion of the male population does it; estimates range from 16 percent to 80 percent. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:42 am by admin
Bottelier, a China expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies in Washington. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:35 pm
"So many of us are dependent on driving, especially in regions where public transportation does not exist, or is inconvenient, or runs irregularly. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
Emory generates $1 billion in revenues and has 8400 employees. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 10:27 pm
      This change does NOT apply to Backyard Harvests-- these are the tiny harvests with just 1-10 people harvesting at a private residence. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:42 pm
For subsequent years, the formula changes and each RDA is obligated, upon threat of termination, to pay its share of $400 million (adjusted based on the increase or decrease in property tax increments), PLUS 80% of the share of property tax increment that would have been received by schools in its project areas in the absence of redevelopment, less pass-through payments to such schools.[1] The adoption of these two bills does not clear up the ambiguity and uncertainty… [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 3:34 pm
ABX1 26 does contain some differences from the earlier version, including: Tax increments taken from RDAs in 2011-12 fiscal year would be treated the same as other property tax revenues. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 8:35 pm by Gary Rosin
  For each these law schools, not meeting the first-time standard does not mean that the school does not satisfy Interpretation 301-6 based on cumulative Bar passage rates of at least 75% or 80% (proposed). [read post]