Search for: "John Does I-X" Results 581 - 600 of 876
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2011, 12:32 pm by lawmrh
I have no doubt Glass was happy he wasn’t a lawyer regularly appearing before her. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 9:50 pm by Blogger Bob
– TSA Administrator John S. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:45 am by John L. Welch
In other words, does proof of dilution by blurring still hinge on proving that the marks are substantially similar or nearly identical? [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 7:38 pm by Lawrence Solum
If we act on the basis of a hypothetical imperative (if I want X, then I should do Y), we act on the basis of desire and inclination--"heteronomously" in Kant's terminology. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 5:43 am by Susan Brenner
As Wikipedia notes, collateral estoppel raises concerns about due process of law, because it wouldn’t be fair for me to sue John Doe, get a judgment and then use the principle of collateral estoppel to try to ALSO enforce that judgment against Fred Roe, who wasn’t involved in the Brenner-Doe lawsuit. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:05 am by Ken Lammers
"I understand you're trying to make an argument that he won't be reformed in jail and maybe you have alternatives X, Y, & Z in mind that you're going to try to sell me on next, but you've already set my state of mind and there's a high probability that you've scuttled the rest of your argument.BUT, but, you say, I've heard well respected, long-time practitioner John Smith Esq. say the same things to you, Mr. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:58 am by SHG
" They are not finding that x caused y; at best they are finding that x perhaps caused y, or that it is not completely impossible that x caused y, or something along those lines. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
I mean really, how often does prior art have sex appeal? [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:41 pm by Adam Wagner
Updated x 2 | Today, guardian.co.uk’s Comment is Free (CIF) was “taken over” by the Occupy London movement. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:31 pm by Lawrence Solum
Given that an agent has end X, it is rational for the agent to engage in action Y, only if Y will lead to X. [read post]