Search for: "Johnson v. State of California" Results 581 - 600 of 1,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2011, 8:05 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 50028 (ED CA, May 9, 2011), a California federal magistrate judge recommended denying an inmate's claim in a habeas corpus proceeding that he was required by state officials to participate in a faith-based AA/NA program as a condition of parole. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:24 am by David DePaolo
So if a doctor said it was necessary then it was...Now, the First District Court of Appeals for California has agreed to hear a constitutional challenge to the IMR process.A date and time for the oral argument in Stevens v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:52 am by Nabiha Syed
Lyle Denniston provides a general overview of United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 8:18 pm by cdw
In what some may call a blistering assault on the trial prosecutor, the Florida Supreme Court in Paul Beasley Johnson v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am by John Elwood
State Bar of California and Lathrop v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 9:51 am by Barbara Lichman
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987); to a regulation that deprives property of all of its economically viable use, Lucas v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am by John Elwood
Louisiana issues that notched yet another relist Johnson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” At Reuters, Alison Frankel weighs in on Monday’s argument in California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Washington Blade, Chris Johnson reports that the florist “[c]ontend[s] the state attorney general had clear anti-religion bias in pursuing the case against her. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
LEXIS 78973 (ED CA, Sept. 3, 2009), a California federal magistrate judge recommended rejection of a prisoner's free exercise claim, finding that he had not described how restrictions on his access to Native American religious services burdened his ability to practice his religion.In Johnson v. [read post]