Search for: "Judicial Review Council"
Results 581 - 600
of 4,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2016, 1:15 pm
However, now that the Parliament and Council have completed a legal-linguistic review of the text, the full English-language version of the compromise text is now available. [read post]
3 May 2019, 9:30 pm
On HNN: Anders Walker, Racism’s Longue Durée: Why the Citizens’ Councils Matter Now, a review of Stephanie Rolph's Resisting Equality: The Citizens’ Council, 1954-1989. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 2:25 pm
Mr L sought judicial review of this decision. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 4:01 am
Implicating the System: Judicial Discourses in the Sentencing of Indigenous Women explores how judges navigate these issues in sentencing by examining related discourses in selected judgments from a review of 175 decisions. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 12:47 pm
Natural Resources Defense Council, holding that courts should defer to a federal agency’s interpretation of the laws it administers if those laws are ambiguous. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 3:27 pm
The court continued its trend of judicial review with teeth. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 1:39 pm
Mr Justice Supperstone also refused permission for judicial review of Lancashire County Council’s decision over the adequacy of the risk assessment and emergency planning procedures. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 10:45 pm
How far this takes us from the previous position, where the role of the county court was limited to conducting a conventional judicial review of the councils’ decision in such cases, remains to be seen. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:38 pm
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (on the application of) Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants (2020) EWCA Civ 542 The Court of Appeal have their way with the judicial review of the ‘Right to Rent’ scheme. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 5:47 pm
Furthermore, the right to an effective and timely judicial review shall be guaranteed. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
” All four liberal justices dissented, with both Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Stephen Breyer filing dissents calling for “meaningful judicial review” and questioning the constitutionality of the death penalty, respectively. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 11:00 pm
The California Judicial Council is closely monitoring the COVID-19 coronavirus outbreak, and has advised the courts to follow the guidance of the Department of Public Health and the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to limit the spread of the virus. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 1:21 pm
ORDER REGARDING EXTENSIONS OF TIME IN SUPREME COURTPROCEEDINGSThe extension of time granted by Administrative Order 2020-03-20 is hereby amended and superseded to reflect modifications to rule 8.66 approved by the Judicial Council on April 3, 2020.Except as set forth elsewhere in this order, the court extends by 30 days the time periods specified by the California Rules of Court for acts or events in proceedings before this court otherwise due to occur between March 20, 2020 and… [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court decision, the first instance in which the high court declared an act of Congress unconstitutional, thus establishing the doctrine of judicial review. [read post]
22 May 2017, 12:00 pm
He currently serves as a Trustee of Columbia University and as a member of The Dean’s Council of Columbia Law School. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 3:28 pm
I suspect that might well be judicially reviewable, if it could be shown that the likely occupancy level was either known or ought to have been know to the council. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
In the matter of an application by Dennis Hutchings for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 14 Mar 2019. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:06 am
Provost filed a motion for judicial review at the Quebec Superior Court alleging his judicial independence had been breached. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 2:04 pm
Zipporah Lisle-Mainwaring won a judicial review of the Magistrates and Crown Court decisions upholding RB Kensington & Chelsea’s Notice under s.215 Town and County Planning Act 1990, ordering her to paint her Kensington property white, to cover the stripes that may or may not have been painted on the exterior following neighbours bringing a judicial review of her planning permission to demolish and redevelop the site. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:29 am
The controversy is not confined to Switzerland, as the legality of the new UK DRIP Act is being challenged by a Member of Parliament who is seeking a judicial review about the whether the new legislation is compatible with Article 7 of the European Charter on Human Rights and Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, each of which covers the right of respect for private and family life. [read post]
