Search for: "L-3 Communications Holdings Inc."
Results 581 - 600
of 867
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements.For a live daily view of industry news, click here for the Vendor Clips Live News Feed.Follow @InfoGovernanceeDiscovery News Content and ConsiderationsCourt Orders Retention of Outside Vendor to Collect Responsive Documents, Investigate Possible Spoliation –… [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:49 am
L. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:22 pm
[10] Techno Ethics, Challenges in Emerging Technology, Mark L. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:13 am
Prof'l Conduct 1.15 and Local Rule AT-3(A), "counsel is expected to continue representation through completion of the case. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:19 pm
Laidlaw Envt’l Servs. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm
COME NOW, the above named defendants by and through their attorneys of record, L. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:15 pm
The following examples of abusive tax scheme investigations are written from public record documents on file in the court records in the judicial district in which the cases were prosecuted. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:14 am
Bernstein, and Jennifer L. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
The article below first appeared in the ABA's Magazine, Antitrust, Vol. 26, No. 3. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm
Rockwell Int’l Corp., 580 F.Supp. 2d 1071, 1122 (D. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
July 12, 2012), holding that sec 893.13(1(a), (6)(a), Fla. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:09 am
In L-3 Communications, the agreement in question contained no details about the mediation process. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 2:58 pm
In L-3 Communications, the agreement in question contained no details about the mediation process. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
While most of our work at QuestionCopyright.org addresses artists and audiences, we're also always on the lookout for good pieces intended for the legal and policy research communities. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 12:51 pm
Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 11:46 am
Ashland Inc.3. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:33 pm
“Inc. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm
Virginia analysis due to its subjective view that those inferences do not “more likely than not flow from” the trial evidence should be reversed given that it conflicts with this Court's holdings that a federal habeas court conducting a Jackson review must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, presume that the jury resolved any conflicting factual inferences in favor of the prosecution, and defer to that resolution; (3) whether the court… [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:58 am
The court sent the cases against CACI International Inc. and L-3 Communications Holdings Inc. [read post]
