Search for: "L-3 Services Inc" Results 581 - 600 of 2,720
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
Perjured testimony would certainly encourage courts to permit juries to consider whether the witness payments were for the substance of testimony, rather than for disinterested professional services. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Lustgarten had misrepresented the applicable standard of care and accused one of the malpractice defendants of having intentionally falsified medical records without a good faith basis.[2] A reviewing trial court reversed the finding of misrepresentation of the standard of care, but agreed that Lustgarden had wrongly asserted the defendant’s fabrication of records, and modified the revocation to a one year suspension.[3] On appeal to the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the court held… [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 1:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
One Int’l, Inc., No. 11-CV-05149-YGR, 2012 WL 4068632, at *3 (N.D. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
  The physicians conducted radiologic and pulmonary function examinations, and submitted requests to Medicare for reimbursement of inflated costs for these services [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
The specific detail of the challenge may have shown that the witness had relied upon a study that was thoroughly flawed,[2] or that the witness relied upon an epidemiologic study of a type that cannot support a causal inference.[3] Rule 702 and the Supreme Court’s decision in Joiner make clear that the trial court must evaluate the expert witness’s application of methodology and whether it actually supports valid inferences leading to the witness’s claims and… [read post]
27 May 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) 3. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:45 am by Sophie Corke
Public.Resource.Org, Inc. | [GuestPost] The Nadorcott Case - Shifting the plant variety paradigm from a proprietary to a liability rule | In memoriam: Dr. [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Pavloff and FBZ have not produced a retainer agreement and have acknowledged that they never made a retainer agreement for their services to Am Trust in the Underlying Action. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:03 am by Schachtman
J & L Fiber Services, Inc., No. 1:07-CV-1191, 2015 WL 1472015, at *20 (N.D.N.Y. [read post]
”(10) • “Sufficient evidence includes, at a minimum, evidence of (1) particular services performed, (2) who performed those services, (3) approximately when the services were performed, (4) the reasonable amount of time required to perform the services, and (5) the reasonable hourly rate for each person performing such services. [read post]