Search for: "Mark A. Lemley"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am
But dilution has its own creep—no attorney wants to tell a client “you don’t have the special mark, you just have a mark. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 6:21 am
A primary thrust of the brief is to challenge the conclusions made by Mark Lemley in his article, Why Do Juries Decide if Patents are Valid? [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 12:46 pm
Scott Hemphill and Stanford Law School Professor Mark A. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm
To be clear, Professor Lemley is the U.S. patent law expert, in general. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:51 am
But Bay Area lawyer Mark Lemley has taken a far more noticeable approach: He fired the company as a client. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
The panel is entitled The Two Halves of Biolaw (Behavioral Biology and the Law of Biological Innovation), and will feature Dan Burk, Oliver Goodenough, Mark Janis, and Mark Lemley. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 6:06 am
"Recall that Mark Lemley was on the side of the patentee in Metabolite, and thus on the opposite side from Crichton. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
"The court said, 'Well, software is just math; you can't patent math,'" said Stanford legal scholar Mark Lemley. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 4:47 am
" What may have started as some academic thoughts from Cecil Quillen, later pushed by Mark Lemley (and others), ended up being mainlined to foster the economic interests of those in the "Coalition for Patent Fairness. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 12:07 pm
Mark Lemley and others have estimated that about 1-2% of all issued patents have ever been litigated. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
Mauro talks about Mark Lemley's change of sides: In another sign of the legal community's ambivalence about the case, Stanford Law School professor and leading patent scholar Mark Lemley, in effect, switched sides. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 9:54 am
(My article with Mark Lemley doesn't cover Elster, but it talks a bit about this dynamic.) [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:38 am
"Dmitry Karshtedt (Law & Biosciences Fellow, Stanford): Courts have imposed "completeness requirement" based on hodgepodge of doctrines; should recognize in new statutory provision and create new "research patent" for claims that meet other standards but fail completeness.Shawn Miller (Lecturer & Fellow, Stanford; co-author: Mark Lemley): District court judges are less likely to be reversed by the Federal Circuit after they sit with that court by… [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:42 am
, by Mark Lemley ("[T]he [Supreme] Court is unlikely to find a constitutional right to jury trial on issues of patent validity, and certainly not the broad right of the sort that is now common practice.")Strategic Patent Acquisitions, by Fiona Scott Morton & Carl Shapiro ("We report data on patent litigation activity initiated by patent assertion entities and discuss the tactics used by these entities to monetize the patents they acquire.")Predatory Patent Litigation, by Erik… [read post]
15 May 2018, 5:00 am
Mark Lemley leveraged some historical work in an article about simultaneous inventing, and others have looked at those same innovators to tell competing stories.But much of this work is historical. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 9:56 pm
Another option is to go further than the 3d Cir. and declare such payments per se illegal.On the FTC's side, 118 law, economics, and business professors (with counsel Michael Carrier and Mark Lemley) endorse the 3d Cir. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 8:47 pm
Only one patent damages verdict in U.S. history was larger; it was about a pharmaceutical patent and, as Professor Mark Lemley (Stanford) notes on Twitter, was "erased on appeal. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:14 pm
Mark Lemley collected a few examples---jurisdiction, free speech, the dormant commerce clause---back in 2003. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Lemley, Stanford Law School: co-authored paper with Mark McKenna. [read post]
20 May 2007, 8:32 pm
This, however, may be one of those cases in which Mark Lemley and Richard Stallman have a point about the rhetoric of “intellectual ‘property. [read post]
