Search for: "Matter of Howard v Howard"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2009, 2:36 am
Ben Nelson (PDF 644 KB)Letters Regarding the Location for the New Global Strike Command04/03/2009
Notice: Build America Bonds and Direct Payment Subsidy Implementation (PDF 40 KB)Released by the Internal Revenue Service04/03/2009
Opinion in the Matter of Katherine Varnum, et al. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
Excess Copyright – University of Toronto’s Announcement re Non-renewal of Access Copyright License – Howard Knopf publishes the U of T’s press release declaring its decision not to renew the licensing arrangement with Access Copyright and adds some of his own commentary on the matter. [read post]
15 May 2017, 11:30 am
Additional Resources: Howard v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am
The first was Turner v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman notes that “Justice Thomas called for reconsidering qualified immunity in his concurring opinion in Ziglar v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am
The first is Maine Community Health Options v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:19 am
(Eugene Volokh) Yesterday, the New Hampshire Supreme Court announced its opinion in In the Matter of Kurowski. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm
As further evidence of how expensive this litigation is, both sides have a slew of high-priced experts. 1-800 Contacts has 6 experts: Howard Hogan (Gibson Dunn), Dr. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 2:10 pm
Howard Roffman, in turn, supervised Mr. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm
In Hiniker, the PTO institutedreexamination based on prior art considered in the originalexamination (Howard). [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 3:08 am
McNeely, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:07 am
In August 2018, an action was filed with the San Francisco Superior Court to invalidate this tax by, among others, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:52 am
Howard Cnty., the “employee bears the burden of demonstrating that he was speaking as a citizen on a matter of public concern” and is therefore protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 1:36 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 4:21 pm
Puttaswamy v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 11:47 am
The claim has especially rose in prominence due to the matter of Marshall v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 5:53 am
In [an earlier precedent, State v.] [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
"[7] The brief quotes part of Senator Howard's speech,[8] but it misses Howard's central point. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 8:35 pm
Tolub of State Supreme Court in Manhattan, ruled on June 24 in AVA a/k/a Maximilia Cordero v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 3:55 am
That case is Vanskike v. [read post]
