Search for: "Matter of Mark"
Results 581 - 600
of 28,656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2015, 3:18 am
Mark L. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 1:29 pm
MARK BONAMARTE, Defendant and Appellant. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 5:04 am
He begins: "In the matter of immigration, mark... [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 6:00 am
Hat tip to Mark Wojcik, John Marshall Law School (Chicago), of the Legal Writing Prof Blog for providing the link to an ABA posting about this matter. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 5:32 am
As a result, I was contacted by Mark Harris the author of a new book entitled Grave Matters: A Journey Through the Modern Funeral Industry to a Natural Way of... [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 6:12 am
Ashurst's announcement about a partner dismissal for conduct issues marks a shift in mindset about how to handle sensitive internal matters. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:02 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio has indefinitely suspended the law license of Euclid attorney Mark R. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:00 am
The primary Federal Statute covering Trademark matters is referred to as the Lanham Act which begins at 15 U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 2:33 am
4 HANDLING COUNTERFEIT GOODS Anti-counterfeiting is another central activity for trade mark matters in China. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:54 am
Similarly to EU trade mark law, which prohibits registration of signs "which are contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality" [Article 4(1)(f) Trade Mark Directive; Article 7(1)(f) Trade Mark Regulation], the US Lanham Act contains a provision that prevents registration of certain signs on similar grounds.More specifically, among other things §1052(a) provides that "No trademark by which the goods of the… [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 7:22 am
The firm worked on trademark matters, including the marks this suit hinges on, for Reebok in the EU between 2015 and 2022, according to the memo. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 1:00 am
Specifically, according to the Guidelines "[t]he applicant must remove any inconsistencies by amending the description either by deleting the inconsistent embodiments or marking appropriately so that it is clear that they do not fall within the subject-matter for which protection is sought" (F-IV-4.3). [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:58 am
Wasserman It turns out that ink color really does matter. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:45 am
Protectable subject matter: as already suggested in the Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law's report in 2013, the criteria for registrability of EU trade marks no longer include a requirement of 'graphic representation'. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 2:39 am
If only matters were that simple. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 12:00 pm
Clive Gringrass, who wrote the article, and is Microsoft's UK representative on this matter writes: "Trade mark legislation around the world and, in particular, the UK's Trade Marks Act (1994) makes clear that these registrations are an infringement. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 4:30 am
The relationship between the applicant’s mark and the subject matter or purpose of the goods and services in question were therefore sufficiently direct to render the word mark descriptive of those goods and services, in spite of the fact that the relevant public did not know how the meditation was practised or what the method used exactly consisted of. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 10:05 pm
As an initial matter, Defendant argues that since Plaintiff’s founders acknowledged choosing SAND HILL ADVISORS because of its geographical significance, i.e., the company’s then new location on Sand Hill Road in the heart of the Silicon Valley, Plaintiff was foreclosed from arguing that the SAND HILL ADVISORS mark was anything other than descriptive. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:22 am
[para 40]The fact that the colour red would be one of the several essential characteristics does matter, because (1) since the shape was not considered as the sole essential characteristic of the mark, it fundamentally defeated the invalidation grounds under s. 3(2)(a), (b) and (c) of the 1994 Act on the shape specific exclusions; and (2) it defined the sign at issue as not a 'colour per se' mark.[2] Is the colour ‘red’ defined with sufficient clarity… [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:50 am
No matter how you slice it, Applicant Viccino's was in deep-dish trouble when it appealed from a Section 2(d) refusal to register its logo mark shown below for "delivery of food by restaurants" and "carry-out restaurants. [read post]
