Search for: "Matter of Perez" Results 581 - 600 of 1,049
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2014, 4:55 pm by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, the district court’s conclusion as to when the privilege attached was, as explained later in the opinion, “novel, unjustified, and clearly erroneous as a matter of law,” the appeals court noted. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 5:57 am by Joy Waltemath
The employer was therefore entitled to attorneys’ fees under the EAJA (Gate Guard Services v Perez, April 7, 2014, Rainey, J). [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:37 am
Ted Lieu of Torrance, Carol Liu of La Canada Flintridge and Leland Yee of San Francisco wrote to Perez on March 11…. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm by Schachtman
Perez, 737 F.3d 1117 (7th Cir. 2013) Pseudonymous MK, a worker in Cat’s packing department, developed epidcondylitis (tennis elbow). [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:30 am by Kim Krawiec
One of the things I’ve enjoyed about Perez v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:48 am by Kim Krawiec
  In any event, I will be back later with a wrap-up and concluding thoughts about what the Perez case teaches us regarding egg donor practice and other matters. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:35 am by Kim Krawiec
Perez’s tax rate on this sale over the one-time context. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 6:24 am by Kim Krawiec
         As a matter of tax practice, none of these arguments might matter. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:11 am by Kim Krawiec
Is it true that egg donors were not, as a matter of practice, being taxed on egg donation proceeds before that time if they contested the inclusion in taxable income? [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:54 am
In fact, “[a]s a general matter, state waivers of immunity are narrower than the federal government’s. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Gravelet-Blondin 13-691Issue: (1) Whether it is – or should be – clearly established that police officers per se violate the United States Constitution when they use nontrivial force in the context of passive resistance, regardless of the surrounding circumstances; and (2) whether the Ninth Circuit’s unique treatment of tasers – “intermediate force as a matter of law,” which “must” be justified by the government interest involved … [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, the In the Matter of: Perez v. [read post]