Search for: "Mounts v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 1,235
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am by Kristen E. Polovoy
A facial challenge to Act 120 would succeed if a substantial number of its applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate sweep (United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am by Kristen E. Polovoy
A facial challenge to Act 120 would succeed if a substantial number of its applications are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute’s plainly legitimate sweep (United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
“This case,” Apple’s lawyers said, “presents issues of surpassing importance to the United States economy. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:30 am by Margaret Wood
  It is The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:57 am by Cody M. Poplin
The United States also slapped sanctions on entities based in China, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
By contrast, in the United States (see Firth v New York, 747 NYS 2d 69 (2002)) and in England (see the notes to section 8 of the Defamation Act 2013), the single-publication rule means a cause of action accrues only when the material is first accessed. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 4:41 am by Amy Howe
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse looks at the Connecticut Supreme Court’s recent ruling abolishing the death penalty in that state; she argues that the court “not only produced an important ruling for its own jurisdiction” but also “addressed the United States Supreme Court frankly and directly,” “at a crucial moment of mounting unease. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 8:36 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“Emerson”) and three other defendantsin the United States District Court for the NorthernDistrict of Illinois for infringement of claims 1–5 of the’017 patent. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 5:47 am by Quinta Jurecic
A public comment period on the proposal is now underway, This week saw the Fourth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Richard Hasen
This is the rare case where liberals and conservatives can unite behind the state of Texas. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 3:56 am
The absolute difference between each reading is then converted to give a rotor acceleration in units rpm/s. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
Rule 16(a)(6) is a catchall clause that requires the government to “[a]dvise the defendant’s attorney of evidence favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant’s guilt or punishment to which defendant is entitled pursuant to Brady and United States v. [read post]