Search for: "Nichols v. Nichols"
Results 581 - 600
of 860
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
Nichols preferred the 2003 recipe of Ti818, the district court found that Dr. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
Nichols preferred the 2003 recipe of Ti818, the district court found that Dr. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Brown v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:46 am
Zatarain’s, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
Salinger sued over Hamilton's paraphrasing of his letters and an appeals court ruled against Hamilton, relying on a Learned Hand case, Nichols v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:47 am
In National Comics, Hand was able to combine that precept with a copyright principle he had pioneered two decades earlier in Nichols v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:15 am
Nichols, Faith-Based Family Laws in Western Democracies? [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
There follows a succinct account of Strasbourg jurisprudence on this point, from registration of a doctor Konig v Germany (No1) (1979-80) 2 EHRR 170 (civil right) to liability to tax (not a civil right) (Ferrazini v Italy (44759/98) (2001) STC 1314), via the all important decision in Pellegrin v France (2001) 31 EHRR 26 ECHR not to allow administrative servants the guarantees of Article 6 because their employment involves important state… [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 1:37 am
See Nichols v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:34 pm
This reflects the current law as stated in Chase v News Group Newspapers ([2002] EWCA Civ 1772). [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm
” (Hays Plc v Hartley [2010] EWHC 1068 (QB) at [62]). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 11:02 am
Madore v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
The judge referred to the passage in Lord Nicholls’ speech in Reynolds v Times Newspapers where, after having set out the essential test and illustrative guidelines (at page 205A-C), he ended his summary of the relevant principles (at page 205F) with these words (emphasis added): “Above all, the court should have particular regard to the importance of freedom of expression. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:10 am
The rule has been disapplied in “Reynolds/Jameel” cases, because of the need to make that defence practical and effective: Bonnick v Morris [2003] 1 AC 300 PC at [21-22] (Lord Nicholls). [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
See, e.g., Nichols v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 11:08 am
Nichols Kaster PLLP (FKA NKA (that is, Nichols Kaster & Anderson) has won an appeal before the United States Supreme Court today in a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) case. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 7:42 am
Huber, Hunt, Nichols, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am
While the Court of Appeal in BCA v Singh had regarded it as an open question whether Reynolds applies to opinion, Lords Nicholls and Hobhouse had said in Reynolds ([2001] 2 AC 127, at 201 and 193-5 per Lord Nicholls and 237-8 per Lord Hobhouse.) that the expression of opinion was protected, if at all by, by fair comment. [read post]
