Search for: "PARTY CITY HOLDINGS, INC."
Results 581 - 600
of 2,329
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2020, 5:51 am
In September 2019, the State of California enacted AB 5, which codifies the state’s Supreme Court holding in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
We further hold that the breaching party failed to demonstrate an “unbridgeable discrepancy” between liquidated and actual damages, measured at the time of the breach, to invalidate an otherwise valid contract provision. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am
Courts of Appeals for the 4th, 8th, 9th and 10th Circuits hold; and (3) whether the portion of TWA v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:33 am
City of Cleveland, 661 F. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:58 am
The rule reflects the current board’s view that the NLRA’s intent is best supported by a joint employer doctrine that does not draw third parties, who have not played an active role in deciding wages, benefits or other essential terms and conditions of employment, into collective bargaining and third-party labor disputes to which they are strangers. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:36 am
Premier Integrity Solutions, Inc., 641 F.3d 695 (6th Cir. 2011) (direct observation method of testing does not constitute an invasion of privacy in a criminal, pretrial release program.) [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:34 am
See Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Many states allow for such a change to occur with ease on the marriage license, but New York did not.Laws of 2019, Ch 712 enacted and effective on December 20, 2019, amended Domestic Relations Law §11-a, subd. 1 a to allow the New York City clerk to designate additional staff members as he or she deems necessary to officiate marriages.Laws of 2019, Ch 663, enacted on December 12, 2019, effective 90 days after it becomes a law, amended Family Court Act § 812, subd. 5, and Criminal… [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:50 pm
Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 574 (1985) (citingUnited States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
EXEMPTIONS Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
EXEMPTIONS Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:49 am
On December 11, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of LRC Realty, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 1:27 pm
(…) This understanding is reinforced by our recent holding that ʺunder long‐established principles of agency law, a licensee under a non‐exclusive copyright license may use third‐party assistance in exercising its license rights unless the license expressly provides otherwise.ʺ Great Minds v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 5:06 am
WBNS-TV, Inc., Slip Opinion No. 2019-Ohio-5196. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:13 am
California-registered investment advisers (“CA RIAs”) that manage pooled investment vehicles and are deemed to have custody of client assets are also subject to independent party and surprise examinations. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:33 pm
Kroger, Inc. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
Continuing the tradition of a unanimous ruling for a first opinion, the decision in Henry Schein Inc. v. [read post]