Search for: "People v. Brain" Results 581 - 600 of 1,396
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2023, 7:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Use in content moderation—deciding what to take down—v. using in recommendation—do you have to guard against addiction in recommendation? [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
Several have been left with brain injuries and/or the risk of future complications. [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the recent case (Alafianpour-Esfahani v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 5:31 am by Joe Consumer
Montana Eighth Judicial District and Ford Motor Company v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:57 am
Full post: suesspiciousminds.Judge rules brain-damaged Muslim should not be resuscitated"A man left brain-damaged after a massive heart attack should not be resuscitated, a High Court judge has ruled, despite the likelihood of him wishing to be were he conscious. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:11 am by Andy Mergendahl
is a post from the law firm marketing blog, Lawyerist.com Related posts: Facebook Page v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
The draft Public Order Act 1986 (Serious Disruption to Life in the Community Regulations 2023, if they come into effect, will allow police in England and Wales to impose restrictions on protests and processions that cause “more than minor” hindrance to day-to-day activities for other people. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 2:01 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Without this mandate, the law’s protection of people with preexisting conditions would mean that healthy people could wait until they get sick to buy insurance. [read post]