Search for: "People v. Holder" Results 581 - 600 of 2,857
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
”Now, of course, those same people have no problem at all with anything that Trump has done. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:00 am by Gabriel Chin
In addition to evoking memories of a time when congressional relief for unauthorized migrants was more possible, United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 10:06 am by Sandy Levinson
The only real defense of the special treatment accorded the President appears to be an almost literally insane reliance on "the voice of the people as the voice of God," so that elections become the exclusive mechanism for holding presidents of the United States accountable. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 11:44 am by Katharine Trendacosta
Thankfully, at least at this hearing, there were people reminding Congress of this fact. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 12:09 pm by Peter Groves
  Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona has today given an opinion in SI, Brompton Bicycle Ltd v Chedech/Get2Get (Case C-833/18) EU:C:2020:79: I'm baffled about the "SI" part of the case name, as the Opinion clearly describes the founder of Brompton, Andrew Ritchie, who owns much, perhaps all, of the intellectual property in the design, but in deference to the legal documents I will call him Mr SI until someone tells me to do otherwise.There are two questions… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 6:08 am by Cory Doctorow
That evaluation must be both objective and balanced to protect the rights of users and copyright holders alike. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 11:56 am by Leah Litman and Steve Vladeck
Abortion cases like June Medical are different, they insist, because the interests of the right-holders (women seeking abortions) diverge from the interests of the people subject to the law (clinics and doctors who perform them). [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
India The holders of an Instagram account defended their right to anonymity in the Delhi High Court, describing themselves as a “whistleblower” that “provides a neutral platform for carrying and sharing incidents of sexual harassment”. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
This week, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 5:05 pm by Enterprise Consultants Group
For 2020, the annual contribution limit is $6,000 for people under the age of fifty, and $7,000 for people age fifty or older. [read post]