Search for: "Pope v. Pope"
Results 581 - 600
of 662
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2011, 11:28 pm
” (See, e.g., Presbyterian Church in the United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
Terry v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
[8] See id. at 389-90, 395-96; see also id. at 395-96 (analogizing the Court to the Pope, whose Biblical interpretations Catholics treat as definitive); LEVINSON, supra note 1, at 9-53 (emphasizing that the Constitution and a sacred text are both written, permanent, and viewed as binding authority) [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 3:19 pm
Multiple originalisms, then, are problematic for the same reason that multiple popes are problematic. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 5:04 pm
” Ketchum v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:12 pm
Bushrod is known for, among other things, deciding Corfield v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 9:21 am
In Tedford v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
A v Cornwall Council [2017] EWHC 842 (QB). [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
In Winfield v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
RIAA continues filing lawsuits (Ars Technica) US Copyright – Decisions US Department of Justice: Texas man sentenced to 41 months prison for selling counterfeit software worth $1 million on websites (ContentAgenda) Eminem producers lose bid for massive iTunes royalties (Ars Technica) (Law360) Supreme Court to hear case brought by freelance writers against several major publishers and online media services on the electronic reproduction of freelance works: In re: Literary Works… [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 7:22 am
See Brandenburg v. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:19 am
U.S. (1977), Pope v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 5:20 am
That California judge, featured in Time Magazine,[v] is William W. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:37 pm
For example, in Pope v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:04 am
For example, in Pope v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Pino v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
