Search for: "Potter v. State" Results 581 - 600 of 656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2016, 4:30 am
"  And thus we have an introduction to today’s case, Tersigni v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
Shortly after taking office, he had an opportunity to do that, with Justice Potter Stewart’s announcement in June 1981 that he would retire in early July. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
 Their estimate is based on a 2007 CDC FoodNet survey that found ~3% of people surveyed in 10 states reported drinking raw milk in the last 7 days (25). [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:23 am by Shamnad Basheer
Pranesh further criticized the decision of Justice Manmohan Singh of the Delhi High Court in John Wiley v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:23 am by jamison
 In Fatal Justice from 1995, for example, Jerry Allen Potter and Fred Bost tell a different story. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
    The “hygiene hypothesis” is an accepted phenomenon that states children without (or with reduced) exposure to infectious agents (especially parasites) and other microorganisms are more susceptible to developing allergic disease.2. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
It was the criminal theory itself that seemed crafted around the standard for obscenity famously described by Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in the case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by SHG
It’s mostly Potter Stewart’s definition of obscenity from his concurrence in Jacobellis v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:59 pm by Ilya Somin
How about a mandate requiring everyone to see the most recent Harry Potter movie? [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]