Search for: "Roberts v. Superior Court" Results 581 - 600 of 1,136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2013, 11:15 am
According to court documents, Malamas argues the lawyers “developed an attitude of increasing malice” toward him during their representation of him.The law firms named in various lawsuits over the years, some of which no longer exist, include McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Toome Laar & Bell, Raphael Professional Corp., Goodman and Carr LLP, Gardiner Roberts LLP, and Hodder Solicitors, according to a ruling last year in Teplitsky Colson LLP v. [read post]
19 May 2013, 9:12 am by Schachtman
JCCP-2754-03740, California Superior Court, County of San Diego (Jan. 19, 1998). [read post]
16 May 2013, 3:02 pm
G.M., the only other Canadian law blog I could find a citation to was a Slaw post by David Cheifetz in an Ontario Superior Court decision. [read post]
15 May 2013, 3:00 am by Administrator
The bread and butter of provincial court. [read post]
10 May 2013, 9:09 am
Both groups had originally won in a summary judgment, but later, an appellate court reversed the decision in the Bruno case, which it sent to trial.In October 2010, a Superior Court judge had ordered Hryniak to pay Cassels Brock and Peebles for their costs in both motions. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:32 am
Superior Court Justice Kenneth Campbell wrote that, in R v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
In a recent decision from the Ontario Superior Court in Ottawa, Goulding v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:44 am by Robert Odell
After the lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, Bingham moved to compel the case to binding arbitration, citing the arbitration clause in Harris’ employment contract. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
One of the appeals was Robert Hryniak’s motion to set aside the summary judgment ordered by the Superior Court of Justice based on the amended rule. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
He lamented the uncertainty created by the US Supreme Court's odd ruling in US v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:46 am by Daniel E. Cummins
As noted in this previous Tort Talk post, the Pennsylvania Superior Court had gone the other way and allowed for the recovery of attorney's fees in this scenario. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:35 pm by Andrew Langille
Nixon, 2005 BCCA 601 (also see the Superior Court decision).In the recently released decision in Rocha v. [read post]