Search for: "Roche v. Roche" Results 581 - 600 of 925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2022, 6:48 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, 580 F.3d 1340, 1365–67 (Fed. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:02 am by Lyle Denniston
Roche Molecular (09-1159) — right of universities to own patents on inventions resulting from federally-funded research  Tues, Mar. 1: Camreta v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Humira (Adalimumab) – US: Bayer HealthCare files patent infringement suit against Abbott Laboratories over Humira; Abbott fires back with lawsuit claiming Bayer’s patent invalid, not infringed or unenforceable (Law360) (Law360) (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) (Patent Baristas) Sprycel (Dasatinib)… [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:40 am by Dennis Crouch
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2188 (2011) (ownership under Bayh-Dole) Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:28 am by Beck, et al.
Roche Laboratories, 671 N.E.2d 252, 258 (Ohio 1996) (label change); Cosgrove v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 4:02 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: EU: Generics producers: Criminal sanctions can stop counterfeit drugs (IP Watch) Prandin (Repaglinide) – US: Federal Circuit grants stay of preliminary relief pending full appellate review: Novo Nordisk v Caraco (Patently-O)   General Eduardo Pisani of Bristol-Myers Squibb is the new IFPMA Director General (IP… [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:42 am
| Friday Fantasies | Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One) | HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio | Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme | Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Roche somehow impacts Patent Reform…it doesn’t. [read post]