Search for: "STATE v ROGERS"
Results 581 - 600
of 3,513
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Rogers Smith once asserted that commitments to liberalism were a constant feature of American constitutional politics. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 5:30 am
Apple vote appeared to dissuade Judge Gonzalez Rogers from considering Epic v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:23 pm
Hunter’s Lessee, and the United States v. the Amistad. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:17 am
State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 4:05 am
Part V discusses how the emergence of the Erie Doctrine in the late 1930s threatened to create a void because state laws on trademark and unfair competition were underdeveloped compared with federal law. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm
In May 2020, the Supreme Court denied cert. in ten cases involving the Second Amendment—including a New Jersey case, Rogers v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 1:34 pm
Considering Rogers v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices capable of… [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 12:36 am
Early last week, Epic Games lost the first round of its #FreeFortnite battle against Apple when Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied the Fortnite maker's motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) with respect to the company's flagship game. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 7:10 am
In an opinion by Rogers, the full D.C. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 5:17 am
In Rogers v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Jeffords v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 7:32 pm
Judge Rogers dissented. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am
In light of its findings on these four elements of the test, the court stated it was not necessary to look at the fifth element of whether Costco would be reasonably compensated for its expenses and legal costs. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am
In light of its findings on these four elements of the test, the court stated it was not necessary to look at the fifth element of whether Costco would be reasonably compensated for its expenses and legal costs. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:12 am
On Monday afternoon, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California held an Epic Games v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
FTDA cases do have slightly lower mean frequency v. [read post]
