Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 581 - 600 of 6,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2013, 6:34 am by Vanessa Schoenthaler
TweetLast week, on Wednesday, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance issued 14 new Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) related to the private offering exemption afforded by Regulation D, Rule 506, this time addressing subsection (d) of the rule (concerning bad actor disqualification). [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 7:24 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
The Natalini plaintiff filed claims against Import Motors, from which he had bought a car, including claims arising under California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) and the Rees-Levering Motor Vehicle Sales and Finance Act. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:45 am by Joy Waltemath
Vacating and remanding summary judgment for a resort management company, the First Circuit found too many disputed facts as to whether a marketing and sales director’s breach of contract claims were viable, including whether his contract was void because it required him to work as a real estate broker without a Puerto Rico license, whether his employer was aware, or should have been, when the contract was signed that a license would be required, and whether all or just some… [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
gives a keenly-awaited Opinion in Joined Cases C-274/11 and C-295/11 Spain v Council and Italy v Council. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:46 am
In Refcomp SpA v Axa Corporate Solutions Assurance SA [Case C-543/10], the Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU, previously known as the European Court of Justice) interpreted Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001 on jurisdiction (the Article) to mean that where the general terms of a sale of goods contract incorporated a clause conferring jurisdiction, that clause could only be relied upon against the original parties… [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 12:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
s (“WesternGeco”) lost foreign sales whendetermining damages for infringement under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:30 pm by Simon Lester
 This Member considers the  rationaleunderlying the Appellate Body's case law on full privatization in the context of Part V of the  SCM Agreement  equally to apply in situations of partial privatization and private-to-private transactions and in the context of Part III of the  SCM Agreement. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:27 pm
S. 303, 308 (1980) (quoting American Fruit Grow­ers, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:35 pm
Banning all handgun sales except for a .22 caliber $1800 model almost certainly violates District of Columbia v. [read post]