Search for: "Samples v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 4,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2017, 12:20 pm
Michaels v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 10:00 pm
The Sample Ballot for the August 24, 2010 Primary in Miami-Dade County is now available. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 9:13 am
Brumfield v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 5:47 am
State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 11:22 am
The first Tunheim email states that “[a]sample is attached,” but we must rely onMr. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:31 pm
Sergeant Ade also informed defendant in accordance with 2 Miranda v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:24 am
The Info Soc Directive (2001/29/EC) and IP Enforcement Directive (2004/48/EC) provide that Member States must provide sanctions and remedies that are effective, proportionate and dissuasive as well as fair and equitable. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 11:40 am
In the case of State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 4:18 am
State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:16 am
Concerning the correspondence between the colour sample and the description, the Court referred to Red Bull v EUIPO (case C-124/18 P, IPKat here), in which the CJEU found that the description must serve to clarify the subject matter and scope of protection sought. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:16 am
State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 6:59 pm
Cir. 1990) (stating that “apparatus claimscover what a device is, not what a device does”). [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:55 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:58 am
What to make of Sevli v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:39 am
The California Supreme Court recently announced its decision in Duran v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 9:04 am
Under a drug-testing procedure, Holland had to provide a urine sample within a three-hour window. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:53 am
Montana’s straightforward law went into effect two and a half years before California’s landmark privacy law, CalECPA, codified similar protections for location data—and five years before the Supreme Court, in Carpenter v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:27 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:27 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 1:19 pm
The report analyzes errors within six of the seven opinions in the sampling period; a seventh will be described in a separate article.A sobering error within the sampling period involved Shelby County v. [read post]
