Search for: "Shields v. United States"
Results 581 - 600
of 2,414
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
This paper draws a comparison between COVID claims and asbestos claims, the “Largest and Longest” wave of occupational disease claims in the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:26 pm
In the aftermath of the Schrems II ruling, Věra Jourova, the Vice President of the European Commission for Value and Transparency has stated in an official press conference that the European Commission will work with their American counterparts to discuss a way forward. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 12:54 pm
The matter, arising from the transfer of Schrems’ personal data by Facebook Ireland to Facebook Inc. in the United States, presented questions concerning the transfer of personal data from the EEA to a third country without an adequacy determination. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 12:54 pm
The matter, arising from the transfer of Schrems’ personal data by Facebook Ireland to Facebook Inc. in the United States, presented questions concerning the transfer of personal data from the EEA to a third country without an adequacy determination. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm
United States Blog Law Online has a post “Trump Hits the Wall of Courts’ Prior Restraint Precedents”. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 10:04 am
Abrams' opinion in Reynolds v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 10:34 am
AOL and Reno v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
-EU Privacy Shield as a basis for transferring personal data from Europe to the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm
” That said, pursuant to the CJEU’s decision, organizations can no longer rely on the Privacy Shield framework to cover transfers of EU personal data to the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
If you were relying on the Privacy Shield: You need to find other ways to permit data transfers into the United States or should consider locating data processing operations to the European Union. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 10:02 am
Privacy Shield (‘the Privacy Shield Decision’). [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
Following the outcome of Schrems I, Schrems reformulated his complaint to the Irish Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) about data transfers arguing that the United States does not provide adequate protection as United States law requires Facebook Inc. to make the personal data transferred to it available to certain United States authorities, such as the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the data… [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:30 am
The Court’s judgment, in Case C-311/18, Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland and Maximillian Schrems (“Schrems II”), holds that the Privacy Shield does not take adequate account of U.S. laws authorizing public authorities to access data transferred from the EU to the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am
Major Connecticut-based corporations are decamping to other states, reducing their in-state footprint, or being acquired by out-of-state firms, including, most recently, the merger of the Massachusetts-based Raytheon Company with the Connecticut-based United Technologies, with the new company to be headquartered in the Boston area.[16] Here too, relocations are not primarily to the Sun Belt, but toward places like New York City, Boston, and Chicago. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
United States, the Court held that new Fourth Amendment precedent must apply retroactively. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 5:03 am
Hellerstein's opinion last week in Cojocaru v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm
’” Ctr. forAuto Safety, 809 F.3d at 1096 (quoting United States v.Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir. 1995)); see also ValleyBroad. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
Spending over six pages detailing United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:35 pm
To date, though the pandemic is a global health and economic phenomenon, the pandemic-related securities litigation activity has been limited to the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a memorandum providing limited but substantial legal protection to Dreamers—immigrants brought to the United States as children. [read post]
