Search for: "State Road Department v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 908
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2012, 12:36 pm by WIMS
" The United States Forest Service (the Forest Service), an arm of the Department of Agriculture (USDA), recently limited the use of motor vehicles to certain roads in the century-old Eldorado National Forest (ENF). [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 11:23 pm by Rich Cassidy
Senator Leahy’s remarks are available through his official web site, “Patrick Leahy, United States Senator for Vermont. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 2:22 pm
This is because the United States Supreme Court determined in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 5:41 pm
” Representative Rohrabacher elaborated that China “supports every rogue enemy of the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Today's court ruling should be a wake-up call for the United States Senate to do its job, hold hearings on RFS2, and address the adverse impacts of this unrealistic program. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:30 am
This was many years before the United States Supreme Court would decide to outlaw school segregation in Brown v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:16 am by John Elwood
The opinion has more references to Justice Roberts, the author of 1936’s United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:26 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Cruikshank, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 1519 (03 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Activa DPS Europe SARL v Pressure Seal Solutions Ltd (t/a Welltec Systems UK) [2012] EWCA Civ 943 (11 July 2012) Leach v The Office of Communications (OFCOM) [2012] EWCA Civ 959 (13 July 2012) SG (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 940 (13 July 2012) Berent v Family Mosaic Housing… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:50 am by 1 Crown Office Row
In O’Halloran v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 21 the European Court of Human Rights held that a provision of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which required vehicle owners to identify the driver, did not involve an infringement of Article 6, even if the identification led to a prosecution. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:00 am by Dan Tench
  In In O’Halloran v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 21 the European Court of Human Rights held that a provision of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which required vehicle owners to identify the driver, did not involve an infringement of Article 6, even if the identification led to a prosecution. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 5:15 pm by INFORRM
  In In O’Halloran v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 21 the European Court of Human Rights held that a provision of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which required vehicle owners to identify the driver, did not involve an infringement of Article 6, even if the identification led to a prosecution. [read post]