Search for: "State of Colorado"
Results 581 - 600
of 21,213
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2024, 9:59 am
Justice Maria Berkenkotter also thought that Colorado lawmakers had not granted powers to Colorado’s state courts to decide Section 3 cases. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
Because Marty focuses on the purely legal consequences of a decision affirming the Colorado Supreme Court and Bruce on the practical effects of such a decision as it's likely to be presented to the public.First, pro-Marty: All that affirming the Colorado Supreme Court decision means, legally, is that it's constitutionally permissible for a state to conclude, through its authorized processes, that Trump is disqualified from appearing on the ballot pursuant to… [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 8:51 am
They are also currently being restored to Colorado, following the passage of Proposition 114 by voters in 2020. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 8:15 am
" This simply isn't true, regardless of whether the Supreme Court upholds or undermines the decision by Colorado (and Maine and other states) to exclude Trump under the Disqualification Clasue. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am
" They do not appear to deny that the Constitution itself is self-executing and can be applied by state actors. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
In the case I read last night, the Colorado man could not clear that bar. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 7:55 pm
Nevertheless, in a post entitled "Marty Lederman's Fundamental Mistake of Law," he writes:[I]t does not follow, as [Marty] seems to suppose, that this principle also precludes Colorado from granting its Secretary of State the authority to exclude Trump from the state’s Republican primary if he is disqualified from the Presidency by the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
Colorado, 600 U.S. 66, 76, 81 (2023). [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm
” I agree, but it does not follow, as he seems to suppose, that this principle also precludes Colorado from granting its Secretary of State the authority to exclude Trump from the state’s Republican primary if he is disqualified from the Presidency by the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
On 1 February 2024, Steyn J dismissed the application to amend the Claim Form and struck out the existing claim in Trump v Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd [2024] EWHC 173 (KB). [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
On appeal to the Supreme Court, the Colorado voters in Trump v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am
To state this position plainly, in unvarnished terms, is, we submit, to expose its utter lack of integrity and legal propriety. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:15 am
Anderson, I noted that the Legislature Thereof Clause argument–that the state court in Colorado botched the interpretation of state law so badly that it mangled the legislature’s preferences (an open… Continue reading The post Did the Colorado Secretary of State help revitalize the Moore v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Trump himself made this Positions Clause argument before the Colorado Supreme Court, and he even prevailed on it in the Colorado district court. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 6:01 am
The original challenges, citing Section 3, were filed in state court. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
READ MORE Colorado Might Pay Former Inmates for Workforce Development A pilot program would provide $3,000 to people leaving Colorado prisons for basic living expenses if they agree to participate in a workforce development program. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
READ MORE Colorado Might Pay Former Inmates for Workforce Development A pilot program would provide $3,000 to people leaving Colorado prisons for basic living expenses if they agree to participate in a workforce development program. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:29 am
Here in the State of Colorado, two different criminal charges involve drinking and driving. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
It was filed in early September 2023 by six Colorado residents eligible to vote in that state’s Republican primary. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 8:50 am
Colorado isn't purporting to "enforce" Section 3, and states don't have any power to enforce its disqualification directive with respect to federal officers. [read post]
