Search for: "State v. Aver"
Results 581 - 600
of 933
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2021, 7:13 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in eBay, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 2:02 pm
Supreme Court case, Sierra Club v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:28 am
Rule 1019 (f) states that averments of time, place and items of special damage shall be specifically stated. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:29 pm
A Washington Court of Appeals recently analyzed the grounds for ordering restitution in State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:53 am
United States suffers from shallow reasoning, lack of historical support, and distortion of legal precedent. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:08 am
In Novartis v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 2:29 pm
An excerpt from Media Matters for America v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm
United States and then again in the 1990 decision, Employment Div. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm
1-800-411-Pain Referral Service, LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 3:17 am
…… it is difficult to see how a person could reasonably have believed in consent if the complaint alleges a state of sleep or half sleep, and secondly it avers that consent would not have been given without a condom. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 12:57 pm
From Corso Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 9:17 am
[Sidebar: Alshdaifat, owner of Holyland Numismatics, pleaded guilty on December 21, 2012 to a reduced charge of misdemeanor accessory after the fact in the cultural property case of U.S. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm
Unfortunately 2022 started with some bad news 👎 for insureds and their liability insurers that are or will be facing lawsuits in New York state courts.Heretofore in New York state court practice, discovery proceeded via demands and responses. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
by guest blogger Alexandra Jane Roberts Last week, California-based burger chain In-N-Out sued Denver-based Smashburger, alleging infringement and dilution of trademarks including DOUBLE-DOUBLE and TRIPLE TRIPLE (for, among other things, “hamburger sandwiches and cheeseburger sandwiches”). [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:06 am
Boyd v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 6:43 am
Vraiment Hospitality, LLC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
Giving plaintiff 'the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from [the] pleading,' this Court determines only whether the alleged facts "fit within any cognizable legal theory' (Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 86 NY2d 307, 318 [1995], quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
Giving plaintiff 'the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from [the] pleading,' this Court determines only whether the alleged facts "fit within any cognizable legal theory' (Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 86 NY2d 307, 318 [1995], quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am
Corp. v. 2319 Richmond Terrace Corp., 141 A.D.3d 626, 627, 34 N.Y.S.3d 616).Oral promise to pay credit card bills during the pendency of action unenforceable In Novick v Novick, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2202438 (Mem), 2019 N.Y. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:17 am
A case titled Escobedo v. [read post]
