Search for: "State v. Cooper" Results 581 - 600 of 7,766
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2013, 3:01 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern Division of Maryland in Greenbelt issued its first ruling Friday granting a defense motion to suppress a warrantless blood test as a result of the Supreme Court decision in Missouri v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 3:52 pm
The government's obligation to disclose Brady material encompasses not only oral, unrecorded statements of a cooperating witness that are favorable to the accused, as held in Rodriguez, previously discussed here, but also exculpatory statements communicated to the government by the witness's lawyer, the Second Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 12:39 pm by WIMS
Mukasey, 534 F.3d at 188 (quoting Council of Alternative Political Parties v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:54 pm by Sme
App., March 29, 2018) (declining to disturb determination that holiday actress was Deseret employee: the Board's conclusion that she was under the control and direction of Deseret Book was supported by substantial evidence)Fur Breeders Agricultural Cooperative v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:21 am by Lyle Denniston
  The states were required to yield to national supremacy (reinforced by Article V’s Supremacy Clause). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:46 am by slemberg
By Stephanie Cooper Herdman One of the latest cases to hit the 9th Circuit area in the Fair Debt and Collection Practice arena is the case of Koby v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm by J. Adam Engel
  In that case, Coach Tarkanian alleged that the NCAA was a state actor, and subject to Due Process requirements, because it cooperated with the state university. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:05 am by Tom Smith
While much of the press cooperated with the state’s censorship efforts and has ignored our court battle, we expect that it will ultimately go to the Supreme Court, setting up Missouri v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:12 pm by Ben Allen
The Sixth Circuit attempts to answer that question in United States v. [read post]