Search for: "State v. Duke" Results 581 - 600 of 2,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Siegel (Duke Law).It looks like some of the essays are available on SSRN. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 5:57 pm
  He later moved on, first to Duke, then to the position of Dean of the newly established U.C. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:24 am by James Bickford
United States, while the Des Moines Register reports on Pepper v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
[This is the third installment in a three-part series on the Guest-Post:  States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration:  AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 4:40 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case was South Carolina v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:15 am by Nabiha Syed
  In an op-ed for the New York Times, Jeffrey Rosen discusses United States v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:35 am by Conor McEvily
Duke Law News covers a recent appearance by retired Justice Stevens at Duke Law School. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:55 am
In the first, Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:24 am by Lawrence Solum
Young (Duke University - School of Law) has posted 'The Ordinary Diet of the Law': The Presumption Against Preemption in the Roberts Court (Supreme Court Review, Vol. 2011, 2012) on SSRN. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am by INFORRM
United States Talks of a federal privacy law continue in the United States, the New York Times reports. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am by CMS
Duke of Bedford v Ellis [1901] AC 1 held that the damage did not need to be exactly the same – the rule should be flexible in order to do justice. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Cases that might be particularly well-suited to a historian's perspective include United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 6:49 am by Cannabis Law Group
The BCC moved forward with the proposed rule anyway, and now our L.A. marijuana delivery attorneys are monitoring the situation, as cities appear poised to duke it out in court. [read post]