Search for: "State v. H. E. H." Results 581 - 600 of 3,301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Determining “continuous residency” for the purpose of qualifying for public office or employmentGlickman v Laffin, 2016 NY Slip Op 05842, Court of AppealsCandidates seeking election to the New York State Senate must meet the five-year New York State residency requirement and the one-year Senate District residency requirement as set out in Article III, §7 of the New York State Constitution. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
Jones.* Down the Tubes: H&M Breached Settlement Agreement by Infringing PatentJani analyses Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd v H&M Hennes & Mauritz UK Ltd [2015] EWHC 3298 (Pat), a decision that dealt with a UK patent concerning the tubular fabric in underwired garments such as brassieres.* Goodbye, good luck! [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:16 am
[H]e argues that the district court erred by admitting three exhibits into evidence because they violated the best evidence rule.State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:05 am by Joel R. Brandes
Mistrial Granted an New Attorney Assigned Based upon Failure of Attorney for the Child to Fulfill Attorney's Obligations under 22 Nycrr 7.2 (D) to Advocate Child’s Wishes In Michael H v April H,--- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 6015796 (N.Y.Fam.Ct.) on October 4, 1999, the Court issued an Order awarding April "H ("the mother") and Michael "H. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Charles Ave.New Orleans, LA 70170 Telephone: (504) 582-8752 gfowler@joneswalker.com llamas@joneswalker.com BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLPStuart H. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
(In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1382.)'" blank">U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:34 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Circuit, that court decided its own e-cigarette case on Friday, Competitive Enterprise Institute v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:49 am
 E) Who did Horatio Seymour lose to? [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:03 pm
   Before the Appellate Court, the respondent sought review under State v. [read post]