Search for: "State v. K. A. S." Results 581 - 600 of 6,980
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2009, 1:38 pm by Meg Martin
State Citation: 2009 WY 142 Docket Number: S-08-0280 Appeal from the District Court of Laramie County, the Honorable Michael K. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am by Richard A. Epstein
Further, among the public benefits that government distributes is K-12 education, which means that this rendering of equal protection guarantee throws Brown v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
   In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 12:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In 1975, the Supreme Court in O’Connor v Donaldson held that it was unconstitutional for a state to continue to confine a harmless, mentally ill person. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 3:45 am
Contents include: Loveday Hodson & Troy Lavers, Feminist Judgments in International Law: An Introduction Christine Chinkin, Gina Heathcote, Emily Jones & Henry Jones, Bozkurt Case, aka the Lotus Case (France v Turkey): Ships that Go Bump in the Night Kasey McCall-Smith, Rhona Smith & Ekaterina Yahyaoui Krivenko, Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide Kathryn Greenman & Troy Lavers, The Lockerbie Case (Libyan Arab… [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Merezhko  "The Development of the Science of International Law at the Koretsky Institute of State and Law" by K. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Moreover, the Supreme Court’s judgment explicitly stated that the subject matter of the case was limited to an employment dispute and did not concern the applicant’s fundamental rights. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 8:11 am
The court stated that it was "troubled by plaintiff's approach to this case," and noted some possible inconsistencies in Steinbuch's theory. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 4:06 pm
On February 20, 2008, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of LaRue v DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc., unanimously holding that individual participants in defined contribution plans regulated by ERISA (the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) can sue their plan administrator for a breach of fiduciary duty that reduces the value of their individual account. [read post]