Search for: "State v. Li "
Results 581 - 600
of 6,342
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
” The 1969 Supreme Court decision in Powell v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 4:13 pm
I say he lied about his contact with the Russian govt. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 6:20 am
In Gastelum v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
{The case was People v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:45 am
’” Even though the Norton v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm
" Wiwa v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:36 pm
And it is with that standard that the trouble lies. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
In State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:19 pm
From Miller v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 12:46 pm
(See California v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Circuit Judge Laurence Silberman’s concurrence in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallThis was a no good, terrible, very bad year at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 7:00 pm
(Basu v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 3:38 pm
" United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 12:31 pm
And in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 5:53 pm
The case is also interesting because it was brought entirely under California state law. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:23 am
Second, under New York law, a stock transfer restriction with terms so “onerous” it would result in “annihilation of property” is unenforceable (Lam v Li, 222 AD2d 290 [1st Dept 1995]; Rafe v Hindin, 29 AD2d 481 [2d Dept 1968], affd 23 NY2d 759 [1968]). [read post]
