Search for: "State v. Nicks"
Results 581 - 600
of 737
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm
In an attempt to persuade Tory Rebels to vote against the Leveson 2 amendments, the government added an amendment 62BC which provides that the Secretary of State mandate a review of press regulators alternative dispute resolution procedures, Brian Cathcart considers this in an INFORRM post. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
Its single complaint about the interim map, that it fails to consider state requirements that county boundaries be respected, has long been rejected as a matter of both Voting Rights Act and constitutional (Gray v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Dominion Lodges Suits Against OAN, Newsmax, Ex-Overstock CEO MSN – Nick Niedzwiadek (Politico) | Published: 8/10/2021 Dominion Voting Systems opened another front in its battle against right-wing attacks on the integrity of its technology, filing lawsuits against two conservative media outlets and former Overstock.com Chief Executive Officer Patrick Byrne. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Nicklin J found that, because Ms Murray’s tweet was stated as fact, it had one meaning; the defence of truth failed. [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:34 am
‘Old politics’, a favourite phrase of Nick Clegg, was mentioned in 168 articles“. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:43 pm
It has also recently acquired stronger powers to punish disobedient states. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:30 am
http://t.co/0vWF04PP # Dropbox Reports User Accounts Were Hijacked, Adds New Security Features http://t.co/wQetUfUW # Prison workers settle lawsuit http://t.co/x5ozIgKO # Data breaches up 19 percent, GAO reports http://t.co/8EHEgUQM # Privacy commissioner ‘deeply disturbed’ by Election Ontario’s handling of voter data http://t.co/F0q5SIer # CSO Magazine Publishes Hogan Lovells Article "Dangerous Assumptions About Clouds" http://t.co/LGWFimug # NBC Is The Real Loser… [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:22 am
Nick Lampson and Bob Inglis and Reps. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm
Facebook’s head of news partnerships for Europe, Nick Wrenn, has said “I think the goal for us first of all is to eradicate as much as we can of the hugely fake news and a lot of it is done by spammers for profit. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am
Supreme Court stated in its 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:27 am
A successful prosecution with the narrower continuation in the United States could then be used in the PPH. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
This is an undesirable state of affairs for the reasons given at paragraph 6 of my earlier Memorandum. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 5:55 am
Two state troopers, Lt. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am
There were three consequences of this removal: first, Fortnite could not be downloaded to an Apple device; secondly, previously installed iOS versions of Fortnite could not be updated; and, thirdly, Apple device users could not play against players who had the latest version of Fortnite.[22] 4 The Proceedings On the same day as Apple removed Fortnite from the App Store, Epic commenced antitrust proceedings in the United States District Court… [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
22 May 2021, 7:12 am
No, I don't want to gloat, but it's mind-boggling what happened yesterday in that Oakland courtroom at the end of the main part (they're done apart from closing arguments on Monday) of the Epic Games v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 4:04 pm
Section 127 of the 2003 Act basically repeats the 1984 Act provision wholesale, itself almost a word for word repetition of these earlier Acts, changing only the ambiguous application to any "public telecommunication system" (a necessity following the demise of the state monopoly telephone network and the rise of the Internet, and nicked as a phrase from EC telecoms law) whose definition was debated in Chambers (see further a para or two on..) [read post]
