Search for: "State v. Rice" Results 581 - 600 of 934
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2007, 5:57 am
The case was People v Rice, 2007 NY Slip Op 06503 decided by the First Department on August 23. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 11:30 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
This all changed in 1991 when the Supreme Court of South Carolina ruled in Nelson v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Secretary of state for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Michelle Donelan welcomed President Biden’s executive order implementing the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 10:06 am by Lyle Denniston
The challengers are relying heavily upon a 2000 decision by the Court, Rice v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
There was evidence instead that Dank supplied “BB Formula” to Cronulla, which the club doctor stated was recommended “for animal treatment only” and described as “a unique rice bran extract emulsion. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Pacific Co. v Arizona (1945) demonstrates that state laws might violate the Commerce Clause even when in-state and out-of-state commerce are treated equally. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Durston, as Warden of the State Prison at Auburn, N.Y. 2 v. (1889). [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 13 April, Collins Rice J handed down judgment on meaning in the defamation case of Mehmood (Butt) v Dunya News Ltd [2022] EWHC 905 (QB). [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 4:19 am by Woodrow Pollack
Rice, 16 F.3d 355, 357 (9th Cir. 1994) (quoting Community for Creative Non-Violence v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
Also on 17 July 2023, Collins Rice J granted judgment in default to the claimant and McGee v Lewis [2023] EWHC 1813 (KB). [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 1:34 pm by Lyle Denniston
The challengers to the balloting limitation are relying mainly upon a seven-to-two decision by the Court in the 2000 case of Rice v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
On the same day Collins Rice J will hand down judgment in the case of WFZ v BBC. [read post]