Search for: "Steve Vladeck"
Results 581 - 600
of 727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2023, 10:31 am
" University of Texas law professor Steve Vladeck tweeted that the study revealed "MOHELA won't be injured by the program at all" (emphasis in original). [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 8:57 pm
Steve Vladeck suggests that the transfer of the litigation to Texas will benefit the Trump Administration, because the federal judges in the Fifth Circuit are generally more conservative than elsewhere. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 1:39 pm
That is, what if Steve is right that Rasul controls? [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 10:23 pm
For the record, I am delighted that my friend Steve Vladeck has joined Lawfare as a permanent contributor. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
Steve Vladeck analyzed the decision for this blog, while Jaclyn Belczyk covered the decision for JURIST, The Court also issued its decision in Baker Botts v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:17 am
Steve Vladeck previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:16 pm
On Wednesday, I did a debate on the Second Amendment at the University of Texas with Steve Vladeck, my old sparring partner. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 11:12 am
(Ryan Goodman, Steve Pomper, Steve Vladeck and I also supported including a three-year sunset in our set of principles for any new AUMF in 2021). [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 7:47 pm
First, as Steve Vladeck noted, Trump is “urging” the Court to do something—“staying the Act’s deadline”—that’s … not a thing. [read post]
8 Apr 2025, 1:04 pm
As Professor Steve Vladeck notes, “although habeas is a vehicle through which to challenge the government’s use of the Alien Enemy Act, it’s not (and never has been) the exclusive vehicle for doing so. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 3:38 am
Then comes Steve Vladeck at CNN. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 4:54 pm
. ● Writing for the Atlantic, Law Professor Steve Vladeck discusses the rising problem of the US Supreme Court’s so called “shadow docket,” decisions made outside its regular docket without oral argument. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 9:03 am
I have been able to locate no comparable maneuver (a summary merits decision on a petition for certiorari before judgment) before or since, and neither has my colleague Professor Steve Vladeck, who meticulously tracks the court’s shadow-docket activity. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 2:22 pm
Steve Vladeck has a more thorough analysis and critique of the "temporary" grant funding freeze. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 5:52 am
Reply Steve Vladeck – It strikes me that this topic dovetails with the paper now circulating by Professor Richard Fallon about the role of law professor amicus briefs. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:09 pm
(See, for example, Andrew Kent’s posts here and here, describing these downsides, as well as Steve Vladeck’s response here). [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:27 am
(For an excellent overview of the issues, see the exchange between Steve Vladeck and Peter Margulies over at Lawfare, starting here and here.In Ex parte Quirin the Supreme Court recognized a limited exception to the constitutional requirement of trying crimes in Article III courts. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 4:00 am
Judge Edith Jones of the Fifth Circuit took the occasion to personally and inaccurately insult Professor Steve Vladeck, partly by reading a handful of tweets which did not support her criticisms. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 10:45 am
But, as Steve Vladeck has pointed out, the paper ignores the prong of the test focused on the risk of error and the value of additional safeguards in minimizing that risk. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 4:41 am
Professor Steve Vladeck has written about this problem in clear-eyed detail. [read post]
