Search for: "Stone v. State" Results 581 - 600 of 2,414
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm by Howard Knopf
The Board has purported to be concerned with the public interest all along – so do we really need to etch this into stone, whatever it may mean? [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 4:16 pm by Chanelle Wong
The policy stated that such work would be considered a conflict of interest and that non-compliance could result in termination of employment. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Inc., 27 NY3d 46, 56 [2016]; Scialdone v Stepping Stones Assoc., L.P., 148 AD3d 953, 954-955 [2017]; Klein v Metropolitan Child Servs., Inc., 100 AD3d 708, 711 [2012]; 42 USC § 1983; CPLR art 14-A). [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 11:34 pm
The Defendant (now in liquidation) did not show up to court and clearly stated that it had no intention of appearing either through the liquidators or the sole director and controlling mind.As the Defendant did not attend court, David Stone exercised his judicial discretion to strike out the Defence and Counterclaim. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
And the state, either as the traditionally conceived apex of political order, or as the repository of large aggregations of power within an international state system, now serves as a (but not the) nexus point for the regulatory power of technique. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am by Andrew Hamm
BOLLINGER & STONE: In his dissenting opinion in Abrams v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]