Search for: "Strange v. Powers"
Results 581 - 600
of 964
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2013, 6:05 pm
(Perhaps he'd have preferred the CFPB to address no-downpayment mortgages separately, using the UDAAP power...) [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:56 am
The Supreme Court recently addressed this very issue in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
Unfortunately it appears that, instead of (or perhaps in addition to, given the recent election results) the Ten Commandments, there’s another commandment that the Alabama Supreme Court is following: Thou Shalt (if you’re an Alabamian) Recover From An Out-Of-State Drug Company.While the Alabama Supreme Court certainly has the power to abandon the notion of manufacturer liability for defects in its products (unlike a federal court sitting in diversity), having the… [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
In the Proposition 8 case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm
Some major areas of concern for the JCHR: The Bill introduces a power to confer counter-terrorism functions on the National Crime Agency, provisions to make it exempt from freedom of information law, and to prevent strike action by Agency officials with operational powers; The Bill confers a power on the Lord Chancellor to lift the ban on filming and broadcasting of court proceedings – the JCHR is concerned that this power may discourage certain vulnerable… [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:34 am
The fracas that occurred when COPE was established indicates some expected difficulties with that process - see Tune in live for ANC v COPE name battle. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 5:17 am
According to the story, reproduced here in relevant part: "Opus Dei, the powerful organisation within the Catholic Church, is suing a Danish
publisher for alleged trademark violations involving a card game titled “Opus Dei: Existence After Religion” ... [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:00 am
In Schenck v. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 9:49 pm
The Episcopal Church will do everything in its power to support Episcopal clergy in South Carolina who wish to remain members of this Church.Yes, we already know how this plays itself out. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
Edwards case -- at page 717.)To go into questions of the unwritten powers of General Convention, or the Executive Council, or the Presiding Bishop would be to enter a tangled thicket of church polity and governance, since there are no provisions in any of the Church's foundational documents which confer any adjudicatory powers upon those entities. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
E.g., San Diego Navy Broadway Complex Coalition v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
”); see also Sierra Club v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 9:52 am
Next week’s argument in Marx v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 6:56 am
But nevertheless, and strangely, the Court proceeds to rule on how the provision must be read to ensure its constitutionality. [read post]
15 Sep 2012, 4:17 pm
If someone strangely disappears, how can you prove that they died? [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
As the Supreme Court said in Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
As the Supreme Court said in Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 1:42 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 6:03 am
The equalisation argument is essentially based on a false premise.Note: I would also like to point out the decision of the Supreme Court in Suraj Bhan Meena v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:54 pm
Overrule Hodel v. [read post]
