Search for: "TAYLOR v. STATE"
Results 581 - 600
of 3,087
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am
Sainović thus aligned the ICTY jurisprudence with the Special Court for Sierra Leone’s 2013 ruling in the Charles Taylor case. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:23 am
That was the issue recently in the Second Department in People v Taylor, 2007 NY Slip Op 03111. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:00 pm
CAAF published its opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:18 am
Some Related Posts: * Section 230 Preempts Unfair Competition Law Claim–Taylor v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:38 am
UCANN v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 4:30 am
Typically employees appointed to positions in the classified service* of the State of New York or a political subdivision of the State are subject to their satisfactory completion a probationary period defined in terms of a "minimum period of probation" and a "maximum period of probation. [read post]
3 May 2019, 4:30 am
Typically employees appointed to positions in the classified service* of the State of New York or a political subdivision of the State are subject to their satisfactory completion a probationary period defined in terms of a "minimum period of probation" and a "maximum period of probation. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 6:09 am
Taylor v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 1:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
Brown and Biden v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 1:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 10:12 pm
John Taylor of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, Hon. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 8:50 am
., Appellant v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 7:12 pm
Relying on United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Although an employee organization and the employer are able to retroactively bind each other to the terms of a collective bargaining agreement, they unable to bind third parties to the agreement under color of the Taylor LawBuffalo Niagara Airport Firefighters Assn. v DiNapoli, 2013 NY Slip Op 07227, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn 2009, in response to an "unprecedented" fiscal crisis,* the State Legislature revamped the State's… [read post]