Search for: "TAYLOR v. STATE" Results 581 - 600 of 3,087
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am by Beth Van Schaack
Sainović thus aligned the ICTY jurisprudence with the Special Court for Sierra Leone’s 2013 ruling in the Charles Taylor case. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:23 am
That was the issue recently in the Second Department in People v Taylor, 2007 NY Slip Op 03111. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:00 pm by Zachary Spilman
CAAF published its opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Typically employees appointed to positions in the classified service* of the State of New York or a political subdivision of the State are subject to their satisfactory completion a probationary period defined in terms of a "minimum period of probation" and a "maximum period of probation. [read post]
3 May 2019, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Typically employees appointed to positions in the classified service* of the State of New York or a political subdivision of the State are subject to their satisfactory completion a probationary period defined in terms of a "minimum period of probation" and a "maximum period of probation. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Although an employee organization and the employer are able to retroactively bind each other to the terms of a collective bargaining agreement, they unable to bind third parties to the agreement under color of the Taylor LawBuffalo Niagara Airport Firefighters Assn. v DiNapoli, 2013 NY Slip Op 07227, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn 2009, in response to an "unprecedented" fiscal crisis,* the State Legislature revamped the State's… [read post]