Search for: "Thomas Connors" Results 581 - 600 of 1,188
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2014, 1:34 pm by Kevin Russell
  Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas vigorously dissented. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P­­­_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:00 pm
It has been translated into Japanese, Korean and Portuguese, and translations into Chinese and Spanish are under way.Previous recipients have included, among others, Supreme Court Justices Sandra Day O’Connor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer, Member of the International Court of Justice Thomas Buergenthal, Secretary of State James Baker, Senator George Mitchell, Ambassador Thomas Pickering, IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde, and Transparency… [read post]
23 May 2014, 10:20 am
Nobody wants to live like Thomas Gradgrind—Charles Dickens’s caricature utilitarian, who treats all interactions, including those with his children, in explicitly economic terms. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
How the Justices Dealt With Seattle In turning away this challenge, Justices Scalia and Thomas acknowledged that the Seattle case controlled, but concluded that it should be overruled. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
NLRB Gets #SocialMedia: Board and ALJ Rulings Recap – Washington, DC attorney Ronald Meisburg of Proskauer on the firm’s blog, Labor Relations Update Presidential Council of Advisors on Science and Technology Stresses “Use” Issues in Report – The blogging lawyers and attorneys at Hogan Lovells on their blog, Chronicle of Data Protection Drone Update: While FAA Continues to Swat at Drones, an Appeal of its Policy Takes Off – Washington, DC attorney Harry Cole of… [read post]
6 May 2014, 1:00 pm by Erwin Chemerinsky
Galloway, I realized once again how the results would have been different if only Justice O’Connor had not left the bench and been replaced by Justice Alito. [read post]
5 May 2014, 9:05 am by Lyle Denniston
  They spoke through an opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Antonin Scalia on that point alone. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
But Judge Thomas, who did not participate in the decision and often joins with Judge Scalia, is still on the court. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:38 am by Amy Howe
”  Finally, at truthdig Bill Blum focuses on Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion and the prospect that “the court may soon be ready to make even more drastic changes in the law, taking what some legal commentators have called a final jump down the First Amendment ‘rabbit hole. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:26 am by rhapsodyinbooks
In his dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas basically writes, “Oh, come on! [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 10:51 pm by Elizabeth Ludwin King
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor will provide the opening remarks at what promises to be another fascinating WILIG event. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:49 am by Ilya Shapiro
” With Justice Thomas, however, I would go beyond that simple point and overrule Buckley v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:16 pm by crush
Justice Thomas, in concurrence, observes tension between McCutcheon and Buckley (and says he would overrule Buckley). [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 5:38 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Maybe We Are Getting Closer To A Decision in North Carolina On Whether LegalZoom Is Engaged In The Unauthorized Practice Of Law – Greensboro attorney Mack Sperling of Brooks Pierce in his blog, the North Carolina Business Litigation Report Good Day Sunshine: “The Federal Communications Commission Process Reform Act of 2014″ – Arlington, VA lawyer Rob Schill on Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth on the firm’s CommLawBlog NLRB Goes Long: Regional Director Finds NU Football… [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 4:32 am
What “the free exercise” meant at the time is a hotly debated issue — see Scalia’s and O’Connor’s dueling opinions in Flores. [read post]